Volume 38 - Article 33 | Pages 897–928
Can a cash transfer to families change fertility behaviour?
By Synøve N. Andersen, Nina Drange, Trude Lappegård
Abstract
Objective: This paper assesses the much-disputed relationship between family policy and fertility, and cash transfers and fertility in particular.
Methods: We take advantage of a cash-for-care (CFC) policy introduced in Norway in 1998, and compare the subsequent fertility behaviour of eligible and ineligible mothers over a four-year period. We estimate linear models assessing both the occurrence and timing of second births, relying on a rich set of covariates and a sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of our results.
Results: Contrary to theoretical expectations, the results show that CFC-eligible mothers had a slower progression to second births and lower short-term fertility. The patterns differ between different groups of mothers, and the decline in subsequent childbearing is only statistically significant among mothers with upper secondary (but not higher) education and part-time or full-time employment. We find no increase in short-term fertility in any group of mothers, and suggest that this pattern may be driven by an interaction between the CFC benefit and the already established Norwegian parental leave scheme.
Contribution: The paper demonstrates how policy changes may indeed be associated with changes in fertility behaviour, and that this association may run in theoretically unexpected directions when a given policy is implemented in a wider policy framework. Moreover, it demonstrates how eligible parents may differ in their response to policies depending on the policy’s income effect and the parents’ opportunity costs of childbearing.
Author's Affiliation
- Synøve N. Andersen - Statistisk sentralbyrå (Statistics Norway), Norway EMAIL
- Nina Drange - Statistisk sentralbyrå (Statistics Norway), Norway EMAIL
- Trude Lappegård - Universitetet i Oslo, Norway EMAIL
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
Parental leave policies and continued childbearing in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden
Volume 40 - Article 51
Unemployment and fertility: The relationship between individual and aggregated unemployment and fertility during 1994–2014 in Norway
Volume 46 - Article 35
Introduction to the Special Collection on Finding Work-Life Balance: History, Determinants, and Consequences of New Bread-Winning Models in the Industrialized World
Volume 37 - Article 26
The link between parenthood and partnership in contemporary Norway - Findings from focus group research
Volume 32 - Article 9
Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34
Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries
Volume 20 - Article 14
New fertility trends in Norway
Volume 2 - Article 3
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
Educational trends in cohort fertility by birth order: A comparison of England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland
Volume 51 - Article 36
| Keywords:
birth order,
cohort analysis,
cross-national study,
England,
family size,
fertility,
Northern Ireland,
parity,
Scotland,
Wales
Cash transfers and fertility: Evidence from Poland’s Family 500+ Policy
Volume 51 - Article 28
| Keywords:
cash transfer,
family demography,
low fertility,
Poland,
public policy
Higher incomes are increasingly associated with higher fertility: Evidence from the Netherlands, 2008–2022
Volume 51 - Article 26
| Keywords:
fertility,
income,
inequalities,
Netherlands,
parenthood
The short- and long-term determinants of fertility in Uruguay
Volume 51 - Article 10
| Keywords:
fertility,
panel data,
stages of female reproductive life,
time series,
Uruguay
Impact of family policies and economic situation on low fertility in Tehran, Iran: A multi-agent-based modeling
Volume 51 - Article 5
| Keywords:
economic conditions,
family policy,
Iran,
low fertility,
multi-agent-based modeling
Cited References: 34
Download to Citation Manager
PubMed
Google Scholar