Volume 44 - Article 33 | Pages 811–838  

When partners’ disagreement prevents childbearing: A couple-level analysis in Australia

By Maria Rita Testa, Danilo Bolano

Abstract

Background: Studies investigating the correspondence of birth intentions and birth outcomes focus mainly on women’s and men’s intentions separately and disregard the fact that reproductive decision-making is dyadic.

Objective: We examine the intention–outcome link for fertility taking a genuine couple-level approach. We aim to understand whether a heterosexual couple’s conflict is solved in favour or against childbirth and whether the male or the female partner prevails in the decision-making.

Methods: Drawing on data from the survey Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA), we perform logistic regressions in which couples are the unit of analysis and the variables are computed by combining both partners’ characteristics.

Results: Results show that disagreement about having a first child is located between ‘agreement on yes’ and ‘agreement on not,’ with half of disagreeing couples having a child. By contrast, disagreement about having another child is shifted more towards ‘agreement on not’ and most often prevents the birth of a child. Women prevail in the decision of having a first child, irrespective of gender equity within the couple, while a symmetric double-veto model is at work if the decision concerns a second or additional child.

Conclusions: Couple disagreement is not always sufficient to prevent the birth of a child in a low fertility country such as Australia, and the increasing level of gender equity within the couple does not necessarily imply increasing female decision-making power on childbearing issues.

Contribution: The predictive power of fertility intentions is more accurate in models including both partners’ views. Fertility-related policies should consider the dyadic nature of fertility decisions.

Author’s Affiliation

• Maria Rita Testa - Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali "Guido Carli", Italy EMAIL
• Danilo Bolano - Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy EMAIL

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Ageing and diversity: Inequalities in longevity and health in low-mortality countries
Volume 50 - Article 12

Union formation under conditions of uncertainty: The objective and subjective sides of employment uncertainty
Volume 45 - Article 5

Life after death: Widowhood and volunteering gendered pathways among older adults
Volume 43 - Article 21

Are daughters’ childbearing intentions related to their mothers’ socio-economic status?
Volume 35 - Article 21

Certainty of meeting fertility intentions declines in Europe during the 'Great Recession'
Volume 31 - Article 23

Couple disagreement about short-term fertility desires in Austria: Effects on intentions and contraceptive behaviour
Volume 26 - Article 3

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

Should we be concerned about low fertility? A discussion of six possible arguments
Volume 53 - Article 14    | Keywords: externality, framework, individual-level sources, low fertility, policy

Trends in Indigenous fertility in Canada, 2001–2021
Volume 53 - Article 6    | Keywords: Canada, fertility decline, indigenous, low fertility

Cash transfers and fertility: Evidence from Poland’s Family 500+ Policy
Volume 51 - Article 28    | Keywords: cash transfer, family demography, low fertility, Poland, public policy

The pitfalls and benefits of using administrative data for internal migration research: An evaluation of Australia’s Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA)
Volume 51 - Article 22    | Keywords: administrative data, Australia, internal migration

Lowest low fertility in Spain: Insights from the 2018 Spanish Fertility Survey
Volume 51 - Article 19    | Keywords: fertility desires, low fertility, Spain