Volume 49 - Article 3 | Pages 31–46
The quality of fertility data in the web-based Generations and Gender Survey
By Victor Antunes Leocádio, Anne Gauthier, Monika Mynarska, Rafael Costa
demographic-research.49-3 (zip file, 163 kB)
readme.49-3 (text file, 6 kB)
Abstract
Background: The Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) enables investigating family-related events from a life course perspective. After its first round of face-to-face implementation, various factors resulted in the second round being implemented on the web. Despite its advantages, implementing a web-based GGS has its drawbacks ‒ for instance, possible misreporting, and especially underreporting, of life history variables due to the lack of on-site guidance.
Objective: To assess the quality of GGS second-round data collected through the web by verifying the accuracy of fertility histories.
Methods: We compare the GGS data with population-based estimates from open access sources, the Human Fertility Database (HFD) and the United Nations Population Division (UN), using three cohort indicators and one period fertility indicator that are frequently used as summary measures. We restrict the analysis to the female fertility history data of countries where the second round of the GGS was implemented via the web and the data processing has been completed: Estonia, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Sweden.
Results: For the four indicators, the GGS estimates are consistent with the population-based estimates. With a few exceptions, HFD and UN estimates fall within the GGS confidence intervals (CIs).
Conclusions: Overall, we found similarities that demonstrate the high quality of the data. Our assessment finds no systematic deviation for the cohort indicators and small scale underreporting for the period indicator (nevertheless, also usually within the CIs).
Contribution: The high level of similarity is encouraging for the use of GGS second-round data and the implementation of web-based methods of data collection.
Author's Affiliation
- Victor Antunes Leocádio - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Brazil EMAIL
- Anne Gauthier - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands EMAIL
- Monika Mynarska - Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie, Poland EMAIL
- Rafael Costa - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands EMAIL
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
Exploring the concept of intensive parenting in a three-country study
Volume 44 - Article 13
Free to stay, free to leave: Insights from Poland into the meaning of cohabitation
Volume 31 - Article 36
Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34
Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation
Volume 16 - Article 17
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
Educational trends in cohort fertility by birth order: A comparison of England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland
Volume 51 - Article 36
| Keywords:
birth order,
cohort analysis,
cross-national study,
England,
family size,
fertility,
Northern Ireland,
parity,
Scotland,
Wales
Higher incomes are increasingly associated with higher fertility: Evidence from the Netherlands, 2008–2022
Volume 51 - Article 26
| Keywords:
fertility,
income,
inequalities,
Netherlands,
parenthood
The short- and long-term determinants of fertility in Uruguay
Volume 51 - Article 10
| Keywords:
fertility,
panel data,
stages of female reproductive life,
time series,
Uruguay
Using household death questions from surveys to assess adult mortality in periods of health crisis: An application for Peru, 2018–2022
Volume 51 - Article 8
| Keywords:
adult mortality,
data quality,
household surveys,
Peru
The big decline: Lowest-low fertility in Uruguay (2016–2021)
Volume 50 - Article 16
| Keywords:
adolescent fertility,
birth order,
fertility,
Latin America,
ultra-low fertility,
Uruguay
Cited References: 31
Download to Citation Manager
PubMed
Google Scholar