Volume 16 - Article 17 | Pages 519–554
Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation
By Monika Mynarska, Laura Bernardi
References
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 84(5): 888-918.
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Bachrach, C., Hindin, M.J., and Thomson, E. (2000). The changing shape of ties that bind: an overview and synthesis. In: Waite, L., Bachrach, C., Mindin, M., Thomson, E., and Thornton, A. (eds.). Ties that Bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Bernardi, L. and Gabrielli, G. (2006). Between first and second birth in Italy. In: Riunione, Atti della XLIII (ed.). Scientifica, Società Italiana di Statistica. Torino: 139-142.
Bernhardt, E. (2002). Cohabitation and marriage among young adults in Sweden: Attitudes, expectations and plans. Scandinavian Population Studies 13: 157-170.
Bernhardt, E. and Goldscheider, F.K. (2001). Men, resources, and family living: The determinants of union and parental Status in the United States and Sweden. Journal of Marriage and the Family 63(3): 793-803.
Caldwell, J.C. (1985). Strengths and limitations of the survey approach for measuring and understanding fertility change: alternative possibilities. In: Cleland, J., Hobcraft, J., and Dinesen, B. (eds.). Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: insights from the World Fertility Survey. London [et al.]: Oxford University Press.
Caldwell, J.C. (1982). The wealth flow theory of fertility decline. In: Hoehn, C. and Mackensen, R. (eds.). Determinants of Fertility Trends: theories re-examined. Liege: Ordina Editions.
Carmichael, G.A. (1995). Consensual partnering in the more developed countries. Journal of Australian Population Association 12(1): 51-86.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory. Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.). The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks [et al.]: Sage Publications.
Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R.M., and Waite, L.J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitation versus marital unions. Social Forces 74(2): 609-632.
Corijn, M. and Manting, D. (2000). The choice of living arrangement after leaving the parental home. In: de Beer, J. and Deven, F. (eds.). Diversity in Family Formation. Netherlands: Kluwert Academic Publishers.
CSO (2003). National Census 2002. Population. State and demographic-social structure. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office (CSO).
CSO (2005). Statistical yearbook of the Republic of Poland. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office (CSO).
Duvander, A-Z. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage. A longitudinal study of the propensity to marry in Sweden in the early 1990s. Journal of Family Issues 20(5): 698-717.
Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to Qualitative Research. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Fricke, T. (1997). The uses of culture in demographic research: A continuing place for community studies. Population and Development Review 23(4): 825-832.
Glasman, L.R. and Albarracin, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin 132(5): 778-822.
Haskey, J. (2001). Demographic aspects of cohabitation in Great Britain. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family 15(1): 51-67.
International Social Survey Program (ISSP) (1994). Family and Changing Gender Roles I. Codebook. Köln: Zentralarchiv fuer empirische Sozialforschung.
International Social Survey Program (ISSP) (2002). Family and Changing Gender Roles II. Codebook. Köln: Zentralarchiv fuer empirische Socialforschung.
Kiernan, K. (2002). Cohabitation in Western Europe: trends, issues and implications. In: Booth, A. and Crouter, A. (eds.). Just Living Together: implications of cohabitation on families, children and social policy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kiernan, K. (2000). European perspectives on union formation. In: Waite, L., Bachrach, C., Mindin, M., Thomson, E., and Thornton, A. (eds.). Ties that Bind: perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Knodel, J. (1997). A case for nonanthropological qualitative methods for demographers. Population and Development Review 23(4): 847-853.
Kravdal, O. (1999). Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation? Population Studies 53(1): 63-80.
Kwak, A. (2005). Rodzina w dobie przemian. Małżeństwo i kohabitacja [Family in the Age of Change. Marriage and Cohabitation]. Warsaw: Żak.
Leridon, H. and Villenueve-Gokalp, C. (1989). The new couples: number, characteristics and attitudes. Population: An English Selection 44(1): 203-235.
Lesthaeghe, R. (1983). A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe: An exploration of underlying dimensions. Population and Development Review 9(3): 411-435.
Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in Western countries: an interpretation. In: Mason, K.O. and Jensen, A.M. (eds.). Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 17-62.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review 14(1): 1-45.
Maines, D.R. (2000). The social construction of meaning. Contemporary Sociology 29(4): 577-584.
Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review 12(1): 53-65.
Martin, C. and Thery, I. (2001). The Pacs and marriage and cohabitation in France. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family 15(1): 135-158.
Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design. An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Milles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA [et al.]: Sage Publications.
Nazio, T. and Blossfeld, H.-P. (2003). The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population 19(1): 47-82.
Prinz, C. (1995). Cohabiting, Married or Single. England: Avebury.
Rindfuss, R.R. and Van den Heuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: a precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review 16(4): 703-726.
Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. Fourth Edition. New York, London, et al.: The Free Press.
Rosina, A. (2004). Family Formation and Fertility in Italy. In: Dalla Zuanna, G. and Micheli, G.A. (eds.). Strong Family and Low Fertility: A Paradox?. Dordrecht/ Boston/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rosina, A. and Fraboni, R. (2004). Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy? Demographic Research 11(6): 149-172.
Ryan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks [et al.]: Sage Publications.
Schwandt, T.A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks [et al.]: Sage Publications.
Slany, K. (2002). Alternatywne formy życia małżeńsko-rodzinnego w ponowoczesnym świecie [Alternative forms of marital-family settings in the post-modern world]. Krakow: Nomos.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of the Qualitative Research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Surkyn, J. and Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientation and the Second Demographic Transition in Northern, Western and Southern Europe. An update to: Contemporary research on European fertility. Demographic Research SC 3(3): 45-86 (Andersson, G. and Neyer, G. (eds.).).
Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family 51(4): 873-893.
Thurstone, L.L. (1931). The measurement of social attitudes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 26(3): 249-269.
Trost, J. (1978). A renewed social institution: non-marital cohabitation. Acta Sociologica 21(4): 303-315.
Van de Kaa, D.J. (1987). Europe’s Second Demographic Transition. Population Bulletin 42(1): 1-59.
Van de Kaa, D.J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: from changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review 27(Supplement: Global Fertility Transition): 290-331.
Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1991). From marriage to informal union: recent changes in the behaviour of French couples. Population: An English Selection 3: 81-111.
Witzel, A. (2000). The problem-centered interview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung /Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(1).