Read me Replication files for 'The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Women's Care Work and Employment in the Middle East and North Africa' in Demographic Review March 30, 2024 Replication requires STATA v16.1 Do files All run out of ÒData>Do files>Carework and employment>CMM-CE root v8 CK.doÓ You will need to change the directory at the start of the master do files to wherever you have downloaded the replication folder DR COVID 2024 If any programs (e.g. estout, esttab) are not found, may need to search for programs Data Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford: ÒData>OxCGRT> OxCGRT_latest.csvÓ provided, version we used (CC BY 4.0 license) Official labor force statistics: Labour Market Stats for import.xlsx School calendar data: School Closures COVID-19_Tunis-Morocco-Egypt-Sudan for import.xlsx Need to obtain COVID-19 MENA Monitor waves from www.erfdataportal.com. Available to researchers for non-commercial purposes following registration and data agreement. Specific files: COVID-19 Monitor All HH 2020-2021 panel v5.0.dta COVID-19 Monitor All HH 2020-2021 rep xs v5.0.dta Place the downloaded data in the ÒDataÓ sub-folder Analyses start with complete data files (all observations, all variables) and are sub-set as/if needed in do files. Codebooks and questionnaires (on www.erfdataportal.com) document all variables. Notes: if slightly different versions available and this creates problems, please share your approvals from the data portal with the corresponding author and we can provide the exact versions used. Output Output will run out into the DR COVID 2024 folder, ÒData>Graphs and TablesÓ, graph or table filenames as noted below. Tables Table 1: Pre-pandemic patterns of care work and employment in MENA. Constructed based on referenced studies. Table 2: Sample size (number of observations) by wave and country, various samples Sample size.xls (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Table 3: Logit models and logit fixed effects (FE) models for increase in care work outcome (odds ratios), married women in households with children aged 18 or younger care model.csv (runs out of ÒCMM-CE models v14 CK.doÓ) Table 4: Logit models for employment (odds ratios), women who were employed in February 2020 emp and 0-18 model - prev emp.csv (runs out of ÒCMM-CE models v14 CK.doÓ) Table 5: Direct care work in the past week versus February 2020 (percentage), by country and marital status, women in households with children aged 18 or younger child care v Feb 2020 emp.xls (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Table 6: Percentage of women who were employed in February 2020 who had left employment at the time of the survey, by country, marital status and household composition left v Feb 2020 emp.xls (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Table 7: Employment type in February 2020, women who were employed in February 2020, by marital status and household composition Emp types.xls (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Table 8: Percentage of women who were employed in February 2020 who had left employment at the time of the survey, by February 2020 employment status left v Feb 2020 emp type.xls (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Table 9: Logit models and logit fixed effects (FE) models for increase in care work outcome (odds ratios), married women in households with children aged 18 or younger, pooled models excluding Sudan and Egypt care model sa.csv (runs out of ÒCMM-CE models v14 CK.doÓ) Table 10: Logit models for employment (odds ratios), women who were employed in Feb. 2020, model including industry and formality emp and 0-18 model - prev emp sa.csv (runs out of ÒCMM-CE models v14 CK.doÓ) Figures Figure 1. Conceptual framework for the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on womenÕs employment rates and potential intervening policy or response measures AuthorsÕ construction Figure 2. Employment rates (percentage), by country, sex, and quarter, 2019-2021 Official lm stats.png (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Figure 3. Direct care work in the past week versus February 2020 (percentage), by country and marital status, women in households with children aged 18 or younger child care v Feb 2020 emp.png (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Figure 4. Operating status of schools by country and date Calendar.png (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Figure 5. Percentage of women who had left employment at the time of the survey, women who were employed in February 2020, by country, marital status and household composition left v Feb 2020 emp. png (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Figure 6. Employment type in February 2020 (percentage), women who were employed in February 2020, by marital status and household composition Emp types.png (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Figure 7. Percentage of women who were employed in February 2020 who had left employment at the time of the survey, by February 2020 employment status left v Feb 2020 emp type.png (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ) Figure 8. Industry in February 2020 (percentage), women who were employed in February 2020, by marital status and household composition Ind stat.png (runs out of ÒCMM-CE descriptives v16 CK.doÓ)