Volume 52 - Article 19 | Pages 559–588  

Tempo effects in period TFR: Inspecting the role of shape and scale variations in a cohort model

By Stefano Mazzuco, Lucia Zanotto

References

Aburto, J.M., Basellini, U., Baudisch, A., and Villavicencio, F. (2022). Drewnowski’s index to measure lifespan variation: Revisiting the Gini coefficient of the life table. Theoretical Population Biology 148: 1-10.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Azzalini, A. (1985). A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 12(2): 171–178.

Download reference:

Azzalini, A. and Capitanio, A. (2003). Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t-distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 65(2): 367–389.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. and Feeney, G. (1998). On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review 24(2): 271–291.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. and Sobotka, T. (2012). A demographic explanation for the recent rise in European fertility. Population and Development Review 38(1): 83–120.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chandola, T., Coleman, D., and Hiorns, R.W. (1999). Recent European fertility patterns: Fitting curves to ‘distorted’ distributions. Population Studies 53(3): 317–329.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldstein, J.R. and Cassidy, T. (2014). A cohort model of fertility postponement. Demography 51(5): 1797–1819.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hoem, J.M., Madsen, D., Løvgreen Nielsen, J., Ohlsen, E.M., Hansen, H.O., and Rennerlman, B. (1981). Experiments in modelling recent Danish fertility curves. Demography 18(2): 231–244.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Human Fertility Database (2020). Human Fertility Database.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Keilman, N. (2006). Demographic translation: From period to cohort perspective and back. In: Wunsch, G., Caselli, G., and Vallin, J. (eds.). Demography: Analysis and Synthesis. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 215–225.

Download reference:

Kim, Y.J. and Schoen, R. (2000). On the quantum and tempo of fertility: Limits to the Bongaarts–Feeney adjustment. Population and Development Review 26(3): 554–559.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kohler, H.P. and Philipov, D. (2001). Variance effects in the Bongaarts–Feeney formula. Demography 38(1): 1–16.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mazzuco, S. and Scarpa, B. (2015). Fitting age-specific fertility rates by a flexible generalized skew normal probability density function. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 178(1): 187–203.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Peristera, P. and Kostaki, A. (2007). Modelling fertility in modern populations. Demographic Research 16(6): 141–194.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ryder, N.B. (1956). La mesure des varíations de la fécondité au cours du temps. Population 11(1): 29–46.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schoen, R. (2022). Relating period and cohort fertility. Demography 59(3): 877–894.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schoen, R. and Hargens, L. (2023). Cohort effects on fertility as age-period interactions: A reanalysis of American birth rates, 1917–2020. In: Schoen, R. (ed.). The demography of transforming families. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis. Cham: Springer: 67–92.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Imhoff, E. (2001). On the impossibility of inferring cohort fertility measures from period fertility measures. Demographic Research 5(2): 23–64.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Imhoff, E. and Keilman, N. (2000). On the quantum and tempo of fertility: Comment. Population and Development Review 26(3): 549–553.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Yi, Z. and Land, K.C. (2001). A sensitivity analysis of the Bongaarts–Feeney method for adjusting bias in observed period total fertility rates. Demography 38(1): 17–28.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article