Volume 50 - Article 33 | Pages 967–1004  

Migration, daily commuting, or second residence? The role of location-specific capital and distance to workplace in regional mobility decisions

By Thomas Skora, Knut Petzold, Heiko Rüger

References

Abraham, M., Bähr, S., and Trappmann, M. (2019). Gender differences in willingness to move for interregional job offers. Demographic Research 40(53): 1537–1602.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Abraham, M. and Nisic, N. (2012). A simple mobility game for couples’ migration decisions and some quasi-experimental evidence. Rationality and Society 24(2): 168–197.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Abraham, M. and Nisic, N. (2007). Regionale Bindung, räumliche Mobilität und Arbeitsmarkt – Analysen für die Schweiz und Deutschland. Swiss Journal of Sociology 33(1): 69–87.

Download reference:

Abraham, M. and Schönholzer, T. (2012). Warum Pendeln nicht alle Probleme löst: Präferenzen für unterschiedliche Mobilitätsformen in „dual career“-Partnerschaften. Journal of Family Research 24(3): 229–246.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bielby, W.T. and Bielby, D.D. (1992). I will follow him: Family ties, gender-role beliefs, and reluctance to relocate for a better job. American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1241–1267.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blum, T.C. and Kingston, P.W. (1984). Homeownership and social attachment. Sociological Perspectives 27(2): 159–180.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brueckner, J.K. and Št’astná, L. (2020). Commuting and migration. Journal of Regional Science 60(5): 853–877.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Burd, C., Burrows, M., and McKenzie, B. (2021). Travel time to work in the United States. United States Census Bureau (American Community Survey Reports).

Download reference:

Bushway, S., Johnson, B.D., and Slocum, L.A. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23(2): 151–178.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Champion, T., Coombes, M., and Brown, D.L. (2009). Migration and longer-distance commuting in rural England. Regional Studies 43(10): 1245–1259.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chatterjee, K., Chng, S., Clark, B., Davis, A., De Vos, J., Ettema, D., Handy, S., Martin, A., and Reardon, L. (2020). Commuting and wellbeing: A critical overview of the literature with implications for policy and future research. Transport Reviews 40(1): 5–34.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chemers, M.M., Ayman, R., and Werner, C. (1978). Expectancy theory analysis of migration. Journal of Population 1(1): 42–56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Clark, W.A.V. and Davies Withers, S. (2007). Family migration and mobility sequences in the United States: Spatial mobility in the context of the life course. Demographic Research S6(20): 591–622.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Clark, W.A.V., Huang, Y., and Withers, S. (2003). Does commuting distance matter? Commuting tolerance and residential change. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33(2): 199–221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cooke, T.J. (2013). All tied up: Tied staying and tied migration within the United States, 1997 to 2007. Demographic Research 29(30): 817–836.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cooke, T.J. (2003). Family migration and the relative earnings of husbands and wives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(2): 338–349.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cooke, T.J. (2008). Gender role beliefs and family migration. Population, Space and Place 14(3): 163–175.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cooke, T.J. (2013). Internal migration in decline. The Professional Geographer 65(4): 664–675.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coulter, R. and Scott, J. (2015). What motivates residential mobility? Re-examining self-reported reasons for desiring and making residential moves. Population, Space and Place 21(4): 354–371.

Weblink:
Download reference:

DaVanzo, J. (1981). Repeat migration, information costs, and location-specific capital. Population and Environment 4(1): 45–73.

Weblink:
Download reference:

DaVanzo, J. and Morrison, P. (1981). Return and other sequences of migration in the United States. Demography 18(1): 85–101.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dawkins, C.J. (2006). Are social networks the ties that bind families to neighborhoods? Housing Studies 21(6): 867–881.

Weblink:
Download reference:

de Castro Lameira, V. and Golgher, A.B. (2022). Associations between migration and commuting to work in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo. Population, Space and Place 28(4): 2526.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dubin, J.A. and Rivers, D. (1989). Selection bias in linear regression, logit and probit models. Sociological Methods and Research 18(2–3): 360–390.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eliasson, K., Lindgren, U., and Westerlund, O. (2003). Geographical labour mobility: Migration or commuting? Regional Studies 37(8): 827–837.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Espino, C.M., Sundstrom, S.M., Frick, H.L., Jacobs, M., and Peters, M. (2002). International business travel: Impact on families and travellers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 59(5): 309–322.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Evers, G.H.M. and Veen, A. (1985). A simultaneous non-linear model for labour migration and commuting. Regional Studies 19(3): 217–229.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fan, Y. (2017). Household structure and gender differences in travel time: spouse/partner presence, parenthood, and breadwinner status. Transportation 44(2): 271–291.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Federal Institute for Population Research (2018). Pendelmobilität in Deutschland: Potenziale nutzen – Belastungen reduzieren. Wiesbaden: Federal Institute for Population Research. Policy Brief.

Download reference:

Fischer, P.A. and Malmberg, G. (2001). Settled people don’t move: On life course and (im-)mobility in Sweden. International Journal of Population Geography 7(5): 357–371.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gajendran, R.S. and Harrison, D.A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology 92: 1524–1541.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gawryszewski, A. (1978). The relationship between different types of migration in Poland. Canadian Studies in Population 5: 153–165.

Weblink:
Download reference:

German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) (2024). SOEPcompanion [electronic resource]. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ghimire, R. and Skinner, J. (2022). Perceived reasons for paying more for housing in metro Atlanta: Results from the 2018 Metro Atlanta Speaks survey. Journal of Urban Affairs 44(9): 1289–1310.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goebel, J., Grabka, M.M., Liebig, S., Kroh, M., Richter, D., Schröder, C., and Schupp, J. (2019). The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 239(2): 345–360.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Green, A.E., Hogarth, T., and Shackleton, R.E. (1999). Longer distance commuting as a substitute for migration in Britain: A review of trends, issues and implications. International Journal of Population Geography 5(1): 49–67.

Haas, A. and Osland, L. (2014). Commuting, migration, housing and labour markets: Complex interactions. Urban Studies 51(3): 463–476.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heckman, J.J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1): 153–161.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Helderman, A.C., Mulder, C.H., and van Ham, M. (2004). The changing effect of home ownership on residential mobility in the Netherlands, 1980–98. Housing Studies 19(4): 601–616.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Huber, P. and Nowotny, K. (2013). Moving across borders: Who is willing to migrate or to commute? Regional Studies 47(9): 1462–1481.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Huinink, J., Vidal, S., and Kley, S. (2014). Individuals’ openness to migrate and job mobility. Social Science Research 44: 1–14.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ivancevich, J.M., Konopaske, R., and Defrank, R.S. (2003). Business travel stress: A model, propositions and managerial implications. Work and Stress 17(2): 138–157.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalter, F. (1994). Pendeln statt Migration? Die Wahl und Stabilität von Wohnort-Arbeitsort-Kombinationen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 23(6): 460–476.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kley, S. (2009). Migration im Lebensverlauf: Der Einfluss von Lebensbedingungen und Lebenslaufereignissen auf den Wohnortwechsel. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Download reference:

Laß, I. and Wooden, M. (2023). Working from home and work–family conflict. Work, Employment and Society 37(1): 176–195.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lundholm, E. (2010). Interregional migration propensity and labour market size in Sweden, 1970–2001. Regional Studies 44(4): 455–464.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Marjavaara, R. and Lundholm, E. (2016). Does second-home ownership trigger migration in later life? Population, Space and Place 22(3): 228–240.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McHugh, K.E. (1990). Seasonal migration as a substitute for, or precursor to, permanent migration. Research on Aging 12(2): 229–245.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Melzer, S.M. and Hinz, T. (2019). The role of education and educational–occupational mismatches in decisions regarding commuting and interregional migration from eastern to western Germany. Demographic Research 41(16): 461–476.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mincer, J. (1978). Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy 86(5): 749–773.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mulder, C.H. and Wagner, M. (2012). Moving after separation: The role of location-specific capital. Housing Studies 27(6): 839–852.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Newbold, K.B. (2022). Age and domestic migration effects on workers’ commuting distance. Transportation .

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nivalainen, S. (2004). Determinants of family migration: Short moves vs. long moves. Journal of Population Economics 17(1): 157–175.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nowotny, K. (2014). Cross-border commuting and migration intentions: The roles of risk aversion and time preference. Contemporary Economics 8(2): 137–156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pelikh, A. and Kulu, H. (2018). Short- and long-distance moves of young adults during the transition to adulthood in Britain. Population, Space and Place 24(5): 2125.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Petzold, K. (2020). Migration, commuting, or a second home? Insights from an experiment among academics. European Journal of Population 36(2): 277–315.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pfaff, S. (2012). Pendeln oder umziehen? Mobilitätsentscheidungen in Deutschland zwischen 2000 und 2009. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41(6): 458–477.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rabe, M., Klüter, A., and Tietze, S. (2017). Comparing different distance metrics for calculating distances in urban areas with a supply chain simulation tool. In: Wenzel, S. and Peter, T. (eds.). Simulation in Produktion und Logistik 2017. Kassel: Kassel University Press: 119–128.

Download reference:

Reitsma, R.F. and Vergoossen, D. (1988). A causal typology of migration: The role of commuting. Regional Studies 22(4): 331–340.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rietveld, P., Zwart, B., van Wee, B., and van den Hoorn, T. (1999). On the relationship between travel time and travel distance of commuters. The Annals of Regional Science 33(3): 269–287.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Romaní, J., Suriñach, J., and Artiís, M. (2003). Are commuting and residential mobility decisions simultaneous? The case of Catalonia, Spain. Regional Studies 37(8): 813–826.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rüger, H., Pfaff, S., Weishaar, H., and Wiernik, B.M. (2017). Does perceived stress mediate the relationship between commuting and health-related quality of life? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 50: 100–108.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rüger, H. and Ruppenthal, S. (2010). Advantages and disadvantages of job-related spatial mobility. In: Schneider, N.F. and Collet, B. (eds.). Mobile living across Europe II: Causes and consequences of job-related spatial mobility in cross-national comparison. Opladen, Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers: 69–94.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rüger, H. and Sulak, H. (2017). Wochenendpendeln von Erwerbstätigen in Deutschland: Analysen mit den Mikrozensen 1991 bis 2012. Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning 75(5): 413–427.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sandefur, G.D. and Scott, W.J. (1981). A dynamic analysis of migration: An assessment of the effects of age, family and career variables. Demography 18(3): 355–368.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sander, N. (2018). Germany: Internal migration within a changing nation. In: Champion, T., Cooke, T.J., and Shuttleworth, I. (eds.). Internal migration in the developed world: Are we becoming less mobile?. London New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group: 226–241.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sandow, E. and Westin, K. (2010). The persevering commuter – Duration of long-distance commuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 44(6): 433–445.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schneider, N.F., Limmer, R., and Ruckdeschel, K. (2002). Mobil, flexibel, gebunden: Familie und Beruf in der mobilen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main, New York: Campus.

Download reference:

Schneider, N.F., Lück, D., Ruppenthal, S., Rüger, H., and Dauber, A. (2008). Germany. A country of locally attached but highly mobile people. In: Schneider, N.F. and Meil Landwerlin, G. (eds.). Mobile living across Europe I: Relevance and diversity of job-related spatial mobility in six European countries. Opladen, Famington Hills: Barbar Budrich Publishers: 105–147.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sjaastad, L.A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of political Economy 50(5, Part 2): 80–93.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Skora, T., Rüger, H., and Stawarz, N. (2020). Commuting and the motherhood wage gap: Evidence from Germany. Sustainability 12(14): 5692.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Dalen, H.P. and Henkens, K. (2013). Explaining emigration intentions and behaviour in the Netherlands, 2005–10. Population Studies 67(2): 225–241.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van de Ven, W.P.M.M. and van Praag, B.M.S. (1981). The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection. Journal of Econometrics 17(2): 229–252.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van der Klis, M. and Mulder, C.H. (2008). Beyond the trailing spouse: The commuter partnership as an alternative to family migration. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 23(1): 1–19.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van der Veen, A. and Evers, G. (1983). A simultaneous model for regional labor supply, incorporating labor force participation, commuting and migration. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 17(5): 239–250.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Ham, M. and Hooimeijer, P. (2009). Regional differences in spatial flexibility: Long commutes and job related migration intentions in the Netherlands. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 2(2): 129–146.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Ham, M., Mulder, C.H., and Hooimeijer, P. (2001). Spatial flexibility in job mobility: Macrolevel opportunities and microlevel restrictions. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 33(5): 921–940.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Ommeren, J., Rietveld, P., and Nijkamp, P. (1997). Commuting: In search of jobs and residences. Journal of Urban Economics 42(3): 402–421.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Ommeren, J., Rietveld, P., and Nijkamp, P. (2000). Job mobility, residential mobility and commuting: A theoretical analysis using search theory. The Annals of Regional Science 34(2): 213–232.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Ommeren, J., Rietveld, P., and Nijkamp, P. (1999). Job moving, residential moving, and commuting: A search perspective. Journal of Urban Economics 46(2): 230–253.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zax, J.S. (1991). Compensation for commutes in labor and housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics 30(2): 192–207.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article