Volume 49 - Article 22 | Pages 565–600  

Advanced or postponed motherhood? Migrants’ and natives’ gap between ideal and actual age at first birth in Spain

By Xiana Bueno, Mariona Lozano, Alícia Adserà

References

Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. and McDonald, P. (2002). A comparison of fertility patterns of European immigrants in Australia with those in the countries of origin. Genus 58(1): 53‒76.

Download reference:

Adserà, A. (2006). An economic analysis of the gap between desired and actual fertility: The case of Spain. Review of Economics of the Household 4(1): 75‒95.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Adserà, A. (2011). The interplay of employment uncertainty and education in explaining second births in Europe. Demographic Research 25(16): 513‒544.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Adserà, A. and Ferrer, A. (2014). Immigrants and demography: Marriage, divorce, and fertility. In: Chiswick, B.R., Miller, P.W., Arrow, K.J., and Intriligator, M.D. (eds.). Handbook on the economics of international migration. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.

Download reference:

Adserà, A., Ferrer, A.M., Sigle-Rushton, W., and Wilson, B. (2012). Fertility patterns of child migrants: Age at migration and ancestry in comparative perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 643(1): 160‒189.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Adserà, A. and Lozano, M. (2021). ¿Por qué las mujeres no tienen todos los hijos que dicen querer tener? Dossier Monográfico: Estado del bienestar, ciclo vital y demografía 10: 25‒33.

Download reference:

Afulani, P.A. and Asunka, J. (2015). Socialization, adaptation, transnationalism, and the reproductive behavior of sub-Saharan African migrants in France. Population Research and Policy Review 34(4): 561‒592.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C. and Kohler, H.P. (2004). Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe. Population Studies 58(2): 161‒176.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bleakley, H. and Chin, A. (2010). Age at arrival, English proficiency, and social assimilation among US immigrants. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(1): 165‒192.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bueno, X. (2020). Fertility decisions in transition: Young adults’ perceptions on fertility three decades apart in Spain. The History of the Family 25(3): 386‒405.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bueno, X. and Brinton, M.C. (2019). Gender egalitarianism, perceived economic insecurity, and fertility intentions in Spain: A qualitative analysis. Population studies 73(2): 247‒260.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carlsson, E. (2018). Fertility intentions across immigrant generations in Sweden. Do patterns of adaptation differ by gender and origin? Comparative Population Studies 43.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Castro-Martín, T. and Rosero-Bixby, L. (2011). Maternidades y fronteras: la fecundidad de las mujeres inmigrantes en España [Motherhood and transnational borders immigrants’ women fertility in Spain. Revista Internacional de Sociología 69(1): 105‒137.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chattopadhyay, A., White, M.J., and Debpuur, C. (2007). Migrant fertility in Ghana: Selection versus adaptation and disruption as causal mechanism. Population Studies 60(2): 189‒203.

Weblink:
Download reference:

De Valk, H.A.G. (2013). Intergenerational Discrepancies in fertility preferences among immigrant and Dutch families. The History of the Family 18(2): 209‒225.

Weblink:
Download reference:

De Valk, H.A.G. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2007). Timing preferences for women’s family-life transitions: Intergenerational transmission among migrants and Dutch. Journal of Marriage and Family 69(1): 190‒206.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Del Rey, A. and Grande, R. (2017). The effect of arrival conditions on the reproduction of migrant women. REIS 159: 113‒134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Devolder, D. and Bueno, X. (2011). Interactions between fertility and migration. Catalonia’s 2007 foreign-born population. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica 57(3): 441‒466.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esteve, A., Boertien, D., Mogi, R., and Lozano, M. (2020). Moving out of the parental home and partnership formation as social determinants of low fertility. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 18: 1‒5.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esteve, A. and Treviño, R. (2019). The main whys and wherefores if (in)fertility in Spain. Perspectives Demogràfiques 15: 1‒4.

Weblink:
Download reference:

González-Ferrer, A., Castro-Martín, T., Kraus, E.K., and Eremenko, T. (2017). Childbearing patterns among immigrant women and their daughters in Spain: Over-adaptation or structural constraints? Demographic Research 37(19): 599‒634.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hayford, S.R. (2009). The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course. Demography 46(4): 765‒783.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heaton, T.B., Jacobson, C.K., and Holland, K. (1999). Persistence and changes in decisions to remain childless. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61(2): 531‒539.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heiland, F., Prskawetz, A., and Sanderson, W.C. (2008). Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data. European Journal of Population 24(2): 129‒156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94(3): 319.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Holland, J.A. and De Valk, H.A.G. (2013). Ideal ages for family formation among immigrants in Europe. Advances in Life Course Research 18(4): 257‒269.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kohler, H.-P. (2001). Fertility and social interaction: An economic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kraus, E.K. and Castro-Martín, T. (2018). Does migrant background matter for adolescents’ fertility preferences? The Latin American 1.5 generation in Spain. European Journal of Population 34(3): 277‒312.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kravdal, Ø. (2002). The impact of individual and aggregate unemployment on fertility in Norway. Demographic Research 6(10): 263‒294.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kulu, H. (2005). Migration and fertility: Competing hypotheses re-examined. European Journal of Population 21(1): 51‒87.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Billari, F.C. (2010). Bringing norms back in: A theoretical and empirical discussion of their importance for understanding demographic behaviour. Population, Space and Place 16(4): 287‒305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lindstrom, D.P. and Giorguli, S. (2007). The interrelationship between fertility, family maintenance, and Mexico-US migration. Demographic Research 17(28): 821‒858.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Melnikas, A.J. and Romero, D. (2020). Ideal age at first birth and associated factors among young adults in greater new York City: findings from the social position and family formation study. Journal of Family Issues 41(3): 288‒311.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Milewski, N. (2007). First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation? Demographic Research 17(29): 859‒896.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Milewski, N. and Mussino, E. (2018). Editorial on the Special Issue “New aspects on migrant populations in Europe: Norms, attitudes and intentions in fertility and family planning”. Comparative Population Studies 43.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B. (2011). Differences between fertility desires and intentions: Implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 75‒98.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, S.P. and Rackin, H. (2010). The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review 36(1): 91‒118.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mussino, E. and Ortensi, L.E. (2018). The same fertility ideals as in the country of origin? A study of the personal ideal family size among immigrant women in Italy. Comparative Population Studies 43: 243‒274.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mussino, E., Wilson, B., and Andersson, G. (2021). The fertility of immigrants from low-fertility settings: Adaptation in the quantum and tempo of childbearing? Demography 58(6): 2169‒2191.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ní Bhrolcháin, M. and Beaujouan, É (2015). How real are reproductive goals? Uncertainty and the construction of fertility preferences. Southampton: ESRC Centre for Population Change, working paper 73.

Download reference:

Penn, R. and Lambert, P. (2002). Attitudes towards ideal family size of different ethnic/nationality groups in Great Britain, France and Germany. Population Trends 108: 49‒58.

Download reference:

Philipov, D. and Bernardi, L. (2012). Concepts and operationalisation of reproductive decisions implementation in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Comparative Population Studies 36(2–3): 495‒530.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Puur, A., Vseviov, H., and Abuladze, L. (2018). Fertility intentions and views on gender roles: Russian women in Estonia from an origin-destination perspective. Comparative Population Studies 43.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ray, C.M., Harcey, S.R., Greil, A.L., Tiemeyer, S., and McQuillan, J. (2018). Stability and change in personal fertility ideals among US women in heterosexual relationships. Demographic Research 39(16): 459‒486.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rumbaut, R.G. (2004). Ages, life stages, and generational cohorts: Decomposing the immigrant first and second generations in the United States. International Migration Review 38(3): 1160‒1205.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sennott, C. and Yeatman, S. (2012). Stability and change in fertility preferences among young women in Malawi. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38(1): 34.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Beaujouan, É (2014). Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Population and Development Review 40(3): 391‒419.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Testa, M.T. (2007). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 5: 357‒379.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tomiknson, J. (2019). Age at first birth and subsequenet fertility: The case of adolescent mothers in France and England and Wales. Demographic Research 40(27): 761‒798.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Trinitapoli, J. and Yeatman, S. (2018). The flexibility of fertility preferences in a context of uncertainty. Population and Development Review 44(1): 87.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Bavel, J. (2012). The reversal of gender inequality in education, union formation and fertility in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 10: 127‒154.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Bavel, J. and Nitsche, N. (2013). The prope age for parenthood’ and second birth rates in Europe. European Sociological Review 29(6): 1149‒1161.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van de Kaa, D.J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review 27: 290‒331.

Download reference:

Van Nimwegen, N., Blommesteijn, M., Moors, H., and Beets, G. (2002). Late motherhood in the Netherlands: Current trends, attitudes and policies. Genus 58(2): 9‒34.

Download reference:

Vidal-Coso, E. and Miret, P. (2017). Characteristics of first-time parents in Spain along the 21st Century. REIS 160: 115‒138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vignoli, D., Guetto, R., Bazzani, G., Pirani, E., and Minello, A. (2020). A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The Narrative Framework. Genus 76(1): 1‒27.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wilson, B. (2020). Understanding how immigrant fertility differentials vary over the reproductive life course. European Journal of Population 36(3): 465‒498.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article