Volume 48 - Article 6 | Pages 153–188  

The educational gradient in young singlehood: The role of gender and the gender climate

By Lonneke van den Berg

References

Arnett, J.J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives 1(2): 68–73.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Arpino, B., Esping-Andersen, G., and Pessin, L. (2015). How do changes in gender role attitudes towards female employment influence fertility? A macro-level analysis. European Sociological Review 31(3): 370–382.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beckmeyer, J.J. and Jamison, T.B. (2022). Empowering, pragmatic, or disappointing: appraisals of singlehood during emerging and established adulthood. Emerging Adulthood online first .

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bellani, D., Esping-Andersen, G., and Nedoluzhko, L. (2017). Never partnered: A multilevel analysis of lifelong singlehood. Demographic Research 37(4): 53–100.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bianchi, S.M., Milkie, M.A., Sayer, L.C., and Robinson, J.P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces 79(1): 191–228.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C., Hiekel, N., and Liefbroer, A.C. (2019). The social stratification of choice in the transition to adulthood. European Sociological Review 35(5): 599–615.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? The impact of age norms on leaving home. Demography 44(1): 181–198.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research 15(2): 59–75.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blaauboer, M. and Mulder, C.H. (2009). Gender differences in the impact of family background on leaving the parental home. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 25(1): 53–71.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.P. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143–168.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brückner, H. and Mayer, K.U. (2005). De-standardization of the life course: what it might mean? And if it means anything, whether it actually took place? Advances in Life Course Research 9: 27–53.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bühlmann, F., Elcheroth, G., and Tettamanti, M. (2010). The division of labour among European couples: The effects of life course and welfare policy on value–practice configurations. European Sociological Review 26(1): 49–66.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carr, D. (2002). The psychological consequences of work-family trade-offs for three cohorts of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly 65(2): 103–124.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Clark, V., Tuffin, K., Frewin, K., and Bowker, N. (2017). Shared housing among young adults: Avoiding complications in domestic relationships. Journal of Youth Studies 20(9): 1191–1207.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Constantin, A. and Voicu, M. (2015). Attitudes towards gender roles in cross-cultural surveys: Content validity and cross-cultural measurement invariance. Social Indicators Research 123(3): 733–751.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Corti, G. and Scherer, S. (2021). Mating market and dynamics of union formation. European Journal of Population 37(4): 851–876.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Danziger, S. and Ratner, D. (2010). Labor market outcomes and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children 20(1): 133–158.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Domínguez-Folgueras, M. and Castro Martín, T. (2008). Women’s changing socioeconomic position and union formation in Spain and Portugal. Demographic Research 19(41): 1513–1550.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Duncan, S. and Phillips, M. (2010). People who live apart together (LATs) – How different are they? The Sociological Review 58(1): 112–134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dykstra, P.A. and Poortman, A.R. (2010). Economic resources and remaining single: Trends over time. European Sociological Review 26(3): 277–290.

Weblink:
Download reference:

England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender and Society 24(2): 149–166.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. and Billari, F.C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review 41(1): 1–31.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esteve, A., García-Román, J., and Permanyer, I. (2012). The gender-gap reversal in education and its effect on union formation: The end of hypergamy? Population and Development Review 38(3): 535–546.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esteve, A., Kashyap, R., Roman, J.G., Cheng, Y.H.A., Fukuda, S., Nie, W., and Lee, H.O. (2020). Demographic change and increasing late singlehood in East Asia, 2010–2050. Demographic Research 43(46): 1367–1398.

Weblink:
Download reference:

EVS (2020). European Values Study Longitudinal Data File 1981–2008. GESIS Data Archive.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ford, J., Rugg, J., and Burrows, R. (2002). Conceptualising the contemporary role of housing in the transition to adult life in England. Urban Studies 39(13): 2455–2467.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review 69(6): 751–767.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldstein, J.R. and Kenney, C.T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review 66(4): 506–519.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hamilton, L. and Armstrong, E.A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender and Society 23(5): 589–616.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Härkönen, J. and Dronkers, J. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce: A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review 22(5): 501–517.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Haskey, J. (2005). Living arrangements in contemporary Britain: Having a partner who usually lives elsewhere and living apart together (LAT. Population Trends 122: 35–45.

Download reference:

Heisig, J.P. and Schaeffer, M. (2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review 35(2): 258–279.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hook, J.L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review 71(4): 639–660.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Iacovou, M. (2010). Leaving home: Independence, togetherness and income. Advances in Life Course Research 15(4): 147–160.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2013). The educational gradient in marriage: A comparison of 25 European countries. Demography 50(4): 1499–1520.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kislev, E. (2019). Happy singlehood: The rising acceptance and celebration of solo living. Oakland: University of California Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kjeldstad, R. and Lappegård, T. (2014). How do gender values and household practices cohere? Value–practice configurations in a gender-egalitarian context. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 22(3): 219–237.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Klinenberg, E. (2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. Penguin.

Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The Second Demographic Transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(51): 18112–18115.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review 14(1): 1–45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Billari, F.C. (2010). Bringing norms back in: A theoretical and empirical discussion of their importance for understanding demographic behaviour. Population, Space and Place 16(4): 287–305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427–439.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the Second Demographic Transition. Demography 41(4): 607–627.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McMunn, A., Lacey, R., Worts, D., McDonough, P., Stafford, M., Booker, C., Kumari, M., and Sacker, A. (2015). De-standardization and gender convergence in work–family life courses in Great Britain: A multi-channel sequence analysis. Advances in Life Course Research 26: 60–75.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mize, T.D. (2019). Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science 6: 81–117.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review 26(1): 67–82.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mulder, C.H. and Hooimeijer, P. (2002). Leaving home in the Netherlands: Timing and first housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 17(3): 237–268.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mustillo, S.A., Lizardo, O.A., and McVeigh, R.M. (2018). Editors’ comment: A few guidelines for quantitative submissions. American Sociological Review 83(6): 1281–1283.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ní Bhrolcháin, M. and Beaujouan, E. (2013). Education and cohabitation in Britain: A return to traditional patterns? Population and Development Review 39(3): 441–458.

Weblink:
Download reference:

OECD (2021). Labour force participation rate.

Weblink:
Download reference:

OECD (2022). Population with tertiary education (indicator.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ono, H. (2003). Women’s economic standing, marriage timing, and cross-national contexts of gender. Journal of Marriage and Family 65(2): 275–286.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology 23(1): 431–453.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pessin, L. (2018). Changing gender norms and marriage dynamics in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family 80(1): 25–41.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pongracz, M. and Spéder, Z. (2008). Attitudes towards forms of partnership. In: Höhn, C., Avramov, D., and Kotowska, I.E. (eds.). family change. European Studies of Population. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands: 93–112.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Régnier-Loilier, A., Beaujouan, E., and Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (2009). Neither single, nor in a couple. A study of Living Apart Together in France. Demographic Research 21(4): 75–108.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Roseneil, S. (2006). On not living with a partner: Unpicking coupledom and cohabitation. Sociological Research Online 11(3): 111–124.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rosenfeld, M.J. (2007). The age of independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Sandström, G. and Karlsson, L. (2019). The educational gradient of living alone: A comparison among the working-age population in Europe. Demographic Research 40(55): 1645–1670.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schneider, S.L. (2009). Confusing credentials: The cross-nationally comparable measurement of educational attainment. Oxford University, UK.

Download reference:

Schwanitz, K., Mulder, C.H., and Toulemon, L. (2017). Differences in leaving home by individual and parental education among young adults in Europe. Demographic Research 37(63): 1975–2010.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sironi, M. (2018). Economic conditions of young adults before and after the Great Recession. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 39(1): 103–116.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85–138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stone, J., Berrington, A., and Falkingham, J. (2011). The changing determinants of UK young adults’ living arrangements. Demographic Research 25(20): 629–666.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Torr, B.M. (2011). The changing relationship between education and marriage in the United States, 1940–2000. Journal of Family History 36(4): 483–503.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van De Kaa, D.J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin 42(1): 1–59.

Download reference:

van den Berg, L. and Verbakel, E. (2021). Trends in singlehood in young adulthood in Europe. Advances in Life Course Research 51: 100449.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Verbakel, E. (2012). Subjective well-being by partnership status and its dependence on the normative climate. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 28(2): 205–232.

Weblink:
Download reference:

White, L. and Rogers, S.J. (2000). Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(4): 1035–1051.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A. (2009). You’d better wait!’: Socio-cconomic background and timing of first marriage versus first cohabitation. European Sociological Review 25(2): 139–153.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A. and Dommermuth, L. (2014). Who remains unpartnered by mid-life in Norway? Differentials by gender and education. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 45(3): 405–424.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wrosch, C. and Heckhausen, J. (1999). Control processes before and after passing a developmental deadline: Activation and deactivation of intimate relationship goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 415–427.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article