Volume 48 - Article 23 | Pages 641–680  

Adult children’s union type and contact with mothers: A replication

By Martin Kreidl, Zuzana Žilinčíková

References

Aarskaug Wiik, K., Keizer, R., and Lappegård, T. (2012). Relationship quality in marital and cohabiting unions across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(3): 389–398.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Alderotti, G., Tomassini, C., and Vignoli, D. (2022). Silver splits’ in Europe: The role of grandchildren and other correlates. Demographic Research 46(21): 619–652.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Allendorf, K., Thornton, A., Ghimire, D.J., Young-DeMarco, L., and Mitchell, C. (2021). A good age to marry? An intergenerational model of the influence of timing attitudes on entrance into marriage. European Journal of Population 37: 179–209.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Amato, P. and Booth, A. (1997). A generation at risk. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Amorim, M. (2019). Are grandparents a blessing or a burden? Multigenerational coresidence and child-related spending. Social Science Research 80: 132–144.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Artis, J.E. and Martinez, M.A. (2016). Cohabitation, marriage and relationships with ‘parents-in-law’. Families, Relationships and Societies 5(1): 3–22.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Axinn, W.G. and Thornton, A. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence? Demography 29(3): 357–374.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bengtson, V.L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(1): 1–16.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bengtson, V.L. (1975). Generation and family effects in value socialization. American Sociological Review 40(3): 358–371.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bengtson, V.L., Biblarz, T.J., and Roberts, R.E.L. (2002). How families still matter: A longitudinal study of youth in two generations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Download reference:

Börsch-Supan, A. (2019). Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 7. Release version: 7.0.0. SHARE–ERIC.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., Schaan, B., Stuck, S., Zuber, S., and Team, Share Central Coordination (2013). Data resource profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE. International Journal of Epidemiology 42(4): 992–1001.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brons, M.D.A., Liefbroer, A.C., and Ganzeboom, H.G.B. (2017). Parental socio-economic status and first union formation: Can European variation be explained by the second demographic transition theory? European Sociological Review 33(6): 809–822.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S.L., Manning, W.D., and Wu, H. (2022). Relationship quality in midlife: A comparison of dating, living apart together, cohabitation, and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 84(3): 860–878.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L. and Lu, H.H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies 54(1): 29–41.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A., Kiernan, K., and Chase-Lansdale, P. (1995). Parental divorce in childhood and demographic outcomes in young adulthood. Demography 32(3): 299–318.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Choi, K., Goldberg, R.E., and Denice, P. (2022). Stability and outcome of interracial cohabitation before and after transitions to marriage. Demographic Research 46(33): 957–1006.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Clarkberg, M. (1999). The price of partnering: The role of economic well-being in young adults’ first union experiences. Social Forces 77(3): 945–968.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R.M., and Waite, L.J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces 74(2): 609–632.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Daatland, S.O. (2007). Marital history and intergenerational solidarity: The impact of divorce and unmarried cohabitation. Journal of Social Issues 63(4): 809–825.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Di Giulio, P., Impicciatore, R., and Sironi, M. (2019). The changing pattern of cohabitation: A sequence analysis approach. Demographic Research 40(42): 1211–1248.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dunning, T. (2012). Natural experiments in the social sciences. A design-based approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Download reference:

Dush, C.M.K., Cohan, C.L., and Amato, P.R. (2003). The relationship between cohabitation and marital quality: Change across cohorts? Journal of Marriage and Family 65(3): 539–549.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eggebeen, D.J. (2005). Cohabitation and exchanges of support. Social Forces 83(3): 1097–1110.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Freedman, D. (1991). Statistical models and shoe leather. Sociological Methodology 21: 291–313.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Grundy, E. and Shelton, N. (2001). Contact between adult children and their parents in Great Britain 1986–99. Environment and Planning A 33(4): 685–697.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hajnal, J. (1965). European marriage patterns in perspective. In: Glass, D.V. and Eversley, D.E.C. (eds.). Population in history. Essays in historical demography. Volume I: General and Great Britain. New Brunswick (U.S.A: Aldine Transaction: 101–143.

Download reference:

Hank, K. (2007). Proximity and contacts between older parents and their children: A European comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family 69(1): 157–173.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hank, K. and Buber, I. (2009). Grandparents caring for their grandchildren: Findings from the 2004 Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe. Journal of Family Issues 30(1): 53–73.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Härkönen, J., Brons, M., and Dronkers, J. (2021). Family forerunners? Parental separation and partnership formation in 16 countries. Journal of Marriage and Family 83(1): 119–136.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J.M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214–1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A.C., and Poortman, A.R. (2014). Understanding diversity in the meaning of cohabitation across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 391–410.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. and Wagner, M. (2020). Individualized relationship practices and union dissolution: Differences between marriage and cohabitation. European Sociological Review 36(6): 868–885.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hogendoorn, B., Kalmijn, M., and Leopold, T. (2022). Why do lower educated people separate more often? Life strains and the gradient in union dissolution. European Sociological Review 38(1): 88–102.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hogerbrugge, M.J.A. and Dykstra, P.A. (2009). The family ties of unmarried cohabiting and married persons in the Netherlands. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(1): 135–145.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kailaheimo-Lönnqvist, S., Fasang, A.E., Jalovaara, M., and Struffolino, E. (2021). Is parental divorce homogamy associated with a higher risk of separation from cohabitation and marriage? Demography 58(6): 2219–2241.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2007). Gender differences in the effects of divorce, widowhood and remarriage on intergenerational support: Does marriage protect fathers? Social Forces 85(3): 1079–1104.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2008). The effects of separation and divorce on parent-child relationships in ten European countries. In: Saraceno, C. (ed.). Families, ageing and social policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd: 170–193.

Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(1): 1–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Law and Policy 26(1): 33–55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

King, V. (2003). The legacy of a grandparent’s divorce: Consequences for ties between grandparents and grandchildren. Journal of Marriage and Family 65(1): 170–183.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kreidl, M. and Žilinčíková, Z. (2021). How does cohabitation change people’s attitudes toward family dissolution. European Sociological Review 37(4): 541–554.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lakomý, M. and Kreidl, M. (2015). Full-time versus part-time employment: Does it influence frequency of grandparental childcare? European Journal of Ageing 12(4): 321–331.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography 43(2): 203–221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mikolai, J., Berrington, A., and Perelli-Harris, B. (2018). The role of education in the intersection of partnership transitions and motherhood in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research 39(27): 753–794.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mönkediek, B. (2020). Patterns of spatial proximity and the timing and spacing of bearing children. Demographic Research 42(16): 461–496.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Moors, G. and Bernhardt, E. (2009). Splitting up or getting married? Competing risk analysis of transitions among cohabiting couples in Sweden. Acta Sociologica 52(3): 227–247.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mooyaart, J.E., Liefbroer, A.C., and Billari, F.C. (2022). The changing relationship between socio-economic background and family formation in four European countries. Population Studies 76(2): 235–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. and Bumpass, L. (2012). Reexamining the case for marriage: Union formation and changes in well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(1): 1–18.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. and Michelmore, K. (2018). Cross-national comparisons of union stability in cohabiting and married families with children. Demography 55(4): 1389–1421.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nazio, T. (2008). Cohabitation, family, and society. New York: Routledge.

Download reference:

Nazio, T. and Saraceno, C. (2013). Does cohabitation lead to weaker intergenerational bonds than marriage? A comparison between Italy and the United Kingdom. European Sociological Review 29(3): 549–564.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nock, S.L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues 16(1): 53–76.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Palumbo, L., Berrington, A., Eibich, P., and Vitali, A. (2022). Uncertain steps into adulthood: Does economic precariousness hinder entry into the first co-residential partnership in the UK? Population Studies .

Weblink:
Download reference:

Parker, E. (2021). Gender differences in the marital plans and union transitions of first cohabitations. Population Research and Policy Review 40(4): 673–694.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., and Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reher, D.S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24(2): 203–234.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sandström, G. and Karlsson, L. (2019). The educational gradient of living alone: A comparison among the working-age population in Europe. Demographic Research 40(55): 1645–1670.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Seltzer, J.A. (2019). Family change and changing family demography. Demography 56(2): 405–426.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smith, H. (2003). Some thoughts on causation as it relates to demography and population studies. Population and Development Review 29(3): 459–469.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stanley, S.M., Whitton, S.W., and Markman, H.J. (2004). Maybe i do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues 25(4): 496–519.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Suitor, J.J., Sechrist, J., Gilligan, M., and Pillemer, K. (2011). Intergenerational relations in later-life families. In: Settersten, R. and Angel, J. (eds.). Handbook of the sociology of aging. New York: Springer: 161–178.

Download reference:

Surkyn, J. and Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the second demographic transition (sdt) in northern, western and southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research S3(3): 45–86.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Trávníčková, M. and Kreidl, M. (2021). Slábne v ČR mezigenerační přenos rozvodu? [Is there a declining trend in the intergenerational transmission of divorce? Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 57(5): 531–555.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van den Berg, L. and Verbakel, E. (2022). Trends in singlehood in young adulthood in Europe. Advances in Life Course Research 51: 100449 (online first).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Yahirun, J. and Hamplová, D. (2014). Children’s union status and contact with mothers: A cross-national study. Demographic Research 30(51): 1413–1444.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Žilinčíková, Z. and Kreidl, M. (2018). Grandparenting after divorce: Variations across countries. Advances in Life Course Research 38: 61–71.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article