Volume 43 - Article 56 | Pages 1651–1684  

Estimating abortion incidence using the network scale-up method

By Elizabeth Sully, Margaret Giorgio, Selena Anjur-Dietrich

Abstract

Background: A major challenge in abortion research is accurately measuring the incidence of induced abortion, particularly in restrictive settings. This study tests the network scale-up method (NSUM) to measure abortion incidence, which uses respondent social network data to estimates the size of hidden populations.

Methods: Using NSUM modules added to the Ethiopia and Uganda 2018 Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) community-based surveys, we compute NSUM abortion incidence ratios, and adjust these ratios to account for transmission bias. We conduct internal validity checks to assess the NSUM performance.

Results: The unadjusted NSUM abortion ratios were likely underestimates (Uganda: 15.3 per 100 births, Ethiopia: 3.6 per 100 births). However, the transmission bias-adjusted NSUM abortion ratios grossly overestimated abortion (Uganda: 151.4 per 100 births, Ethiopia: 73.9 per 100 births), which was likely due to selection bias, question wording, and the use of lifetime abortions to measure transmission bias. Internal validity checks revealed problems with the NSUM application in Ethiopia. Unadjusted NSUM estimates of intrauterine device/implant use performed well compared to established external estimates, but adjusting for transmission bias again resulted in overestimation.

Conclusions: The NSUM resulted in overestimates of abortion incidence in Ethiopia and Uganda. We discuss several modifications that may improve future applications of the NSUM for measuring abortion.

Contribution: This is the first test of the NSUM to estimate national abortion incidence. Our findings highlight the critical need to assess the validity of abortion estimates, a key feature of the NSUM that is lacking in most other indirect abortion measurement methods.

Author's Affiliation

• Elizabeth Sully - Guttmacher Institute, United States of America EMAIL
• Margaret Giorgio - Guttmacher Institute, United States of America EMAIL
• Selena Anjur-Dietrich - Johns Hopkins University, United States of America EMAIL

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

The Own-Children Method of fertility estimation: The devil is in the detail
Volume 45 - Article 25    | Keywords: age-specific fertility rate (ASFR), census data, demographic methods, indirect estimation, reverse survival method

Happy parents’ tweets: An exploration of Italian Twitter data using sentiment analysis
Volume 40 - Article 25    | Keywords: parenthood, social network, subjective well-being, Twitter

Identifying interaction effects using random fertility shocks
Volume 40 - Article 10    | Keywords: fertility, instrumental variables, social contagion, social network

WhatsApp usage patterns and prediction of demographic characteristics without access to message content
Volume 39 - Article 22    | Keywords: demographics, social media, social network, usage prediction, WhatsApp

Migration, legality, and fertility regulation: Abortion and contraception among migrants and natives in Russia
Volume 38 - Article 42    | Keywords: abortion, contraceptive use, family planning, gender, migration, reproduction