Volume 43 - Article 16 | Pages 431–460
Oh half-brother, where art thou? The boundaries of full- and half-sibling interaction
References
Ahrons, C.R. (2007). Family ties after divorce: Long-term implications for children. Family Process 46(1): 53–65.
Anderson, E.R. (1999). Sibling, half sibling, and stepsibling relationships in remarried families. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development : 101–126.
Andersson, G. (2002). Children’s experience of family disruption and family formation: Evidence from 16 FFS Countries. Demographic Research 1(7): 343‒364.
Aughinbaugh, A. (2004). The impact of attrition on the children of the NLSY79. Journal of Human Resources 39(2): 536–563.
Bäck-Wiklund, M. and Johansson, T. (2012). Nätverksfamiljen. Stockholm : Natur & Kultur.
Björnberg, U. (2001). Cohabitation and marriage in Sweden: Does family form matter? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(3): 350–362.
Bloome, D. (2017). Childhood family structure and intergenerational income mobility in the United States. Demography 54(2): 541–569.
Brown, S.L. and Manning, W.D. (2009). Family boundary ambiguity and the measurement of family structure: The significance of cohabitation. Demography 46(1): 85–101.
Cancian, M. and Meyer, D.R. (2006). Alternative approaches to child support policy in the context of multiple-partner fertility. Report to the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development.
Cancian, M., Meyer, D.R., and Cook, S.T. (2011). The evolution of family complexity from the perspective of nonmarital children. Demography 48(3): 957–982.
Carlson, M.J. and Furstenberg, F.F. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of multipartnered fertility among urban US parents. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(3): 718–732.
Chapais, B. (2009). Primeval kinship: How pair-bonding gave birth to human society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cherlin, A. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology 84(3): 634–650.
Cherlin, A. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–861.
Danielsbacka, M. and Tanskanen, A.O. (2015). The association between unequal parental treatment and the sibling relationship in Finland: The difference between full and half-siblings. Evolutionary Psychology 13(2).
Danielsbacka, M., Tanskanen, A.O., and Rotkirch, A. (2015). Impact of genetic relatedness and emotional closeness on intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and Family 77(4): 889–907.
Dorius, C. (2011). Reconceptualizing family instability to include measures of childbearing: The practical value of assessing multiple partner fertility. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting for the Population Association of America, Washington, DC, March 31‒April, 2. .
Ganong, L.H. and Coleman, M. (1988). Do mutual children cement bonds in stepfamilies? Journal of Marriage and the Family 3(50): 687–698.
Goetting, A. (1986). The developmental tasks of siblingship over the life cycle. Journal of Marriage and Family 48(4): 703–714.
Guzzo, K.B. and Furstenberg, F.F. (2007). Multipartnered fertility among American men. Demography 44(3): 583–601.
Hadfield, K. and Nixon, E. (2013). Including those that exclude themselves: Comparisons of self-identifying and non-self-identifying stepfamilies. Journal of Family Studies 19(2): 207–216.
Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7(1): 17–52.
Henz, U. and Thomson, E. (2005). Union stability and stepfamily fertility in Austria, Finland, France, and West Germany. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 21(1): 3–29.
Holland, J.A. and Thomson, E. (2011). Stepfamily childbearing in Sweden: Quantum and tempo effects, 1950–99. Population Studies 65(1): 115–128.
Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L., and Feldhaus, M. (2011). Panel analysis of intimate relationships and family dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. ZfF–Zeitschrift Für Familienforschung/ Journal of Family Research 23(1): 77–101.
Jalovaara, M. and Andersson, G. (2018). Disparities in children’s family experiences by mother’s socioeconomic status: The case of Finland. Population Research and Policy Review 37(5): 751–768.
Jonsson, J.O. and Gähler, M. (1997). Family dissolution, family reconstitution, and children’s educational careers: Recent evidence for Sweden. Demography 34(2): 277–293.
Juby, H. and Le Bourdais, C. (1999). Where have all the children gone? Comparing mothers’ and fathers’ declarations in retrospective surveys. Canadian Studies in Population 26(1): 1–20.
Kalmijn, M., Ivanova, K., van Gaalen, R., Leeuw, D.G.S., van Houdt, K., van Spijker, F., and Hornstra, M. (2018). A multi-actor study of adult children and their parents in complex families: Design and content of the OKiN Survey. European Sociological Review 34(4): 452–470.
Kaplan, H., Gurven, M., and Hooper, P. (2009). The evolutionary and ecological roots of human social organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364(1533): 3289–3299.
Kennedy, S. and Fitch, C.A. (2012). Measuring cohabitation and family structure in the United States: Assessing the impact of new data from the Current Population Survey. Demography 49(4): 1479–1498.
Kersting, L. and Feldhaus, M. (2016). Die Qualität von Geschwisterbeziehungen im jungen und mittleren Erwachsenenalter in Abhängigkeit des Verwandtschaftsstatus. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation 36: 382–401.
Kreyenfeld, M., Geisler, E., Castro-Martín, T., Hannemann, T., Heintz-Martin, V., Jalovaara, M., Kulu, H., Meggiolaro, S., Mortelmans, D., Pasteels, I., Seiz, M., and Solaz, A. (2017). Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe. Demographic Research S21(37): 1245–1274.
Kreyenfeld, M. and Jalovaara, M. (2018). Childbearing across partnerships in Finland and Germany. Cham: Springer.
Lappegård, T. and Rønsen, M. (2013). Socioeconomic differences in multipartner fertility among Norwegian men. Demography 50(3): 1135–1153.
Lappegård, T. and Thomson, E. (2018). Intergenerational transmission of multipartner fertility. Demography 55(6): 2205–2228.
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature 445(7129): 727.
Manning, W.D., Brown, S.L., and Stykes, J.B. (2014). Family complexity among children in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 48–65.
Mason, M., Fine, M., and Carnochan, S. (2004). Family law for changing families in the new millennium. In: Coleman, M. and Ganong, L.H. (eds.). Handbook of contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future. Thousand Oaks: Sage: 432‒450.
McLanahan, S. and Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology 34(1): 257–276.
Monte, L.M. (2018). Multiple-partner fertility in the United States: A demographic portrait. Demography 56(1): 103–127.
Müller, B. and Castiglioni, L. (2015). Stable relationships, stable participation? The effects of partnership dissolution and changes in relationship stability on attrition in a relationship and family panel. Survey Research Methods 9(3): 205–219.
Nieuwenhuis, R. and Maldonado, L.C. (2018). The triple bind of single-parent families. Bristol: Policy Press.
Pollet, T.V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(3): 176–185.
Poortman, A.-R. and Voorpostel, M. (2009). Parental divorce and sibling relationships: A research note. Journal of Family Issues 30(1): 74–91.
Rossi, A.S. and Rossi, P.H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course. New York: Transaction Publishers.
Steinbach, A. and Hank, K. (2018). Full-, half-, and step-sibling relations in young and middle adulthood. Journal of Family Issues 39(9): 2639–2658.
Tanskanen, A.O. and Danielsbacka, M. (2014). Genetic relatedness predicts contact frequencies with siblings, nieces and nephews: Results from the Generational Transmissions in Finland surveys. Personality and Individual Differences 69: 5–11.
Tanskanen, A.O. and Danielsbacka, M. (2019). Relationship quality among half siblings: The role of childhood co-residence. Evolutionary Psychological Science 5(1): 13–21.
Tanskanen, A.O., Danielsbacka, M., Jokela, M., and Rotkirch, A. (2017). Sibling conflicts in full-and half-sibling households in the UK. Journal of Biosocial Science 49(1): 31–47.
Tanskanen, A.O. and Rotkirch, A. (2018). Sibling similarity and relationship quality in Finland. Acta Sociologica 62(4): 440–456.
Thévenon, O. and Neyer, G. (2014). Family policies and diversity in Europe: The state-of-the-art regarding fertility, work, care, leave, laws and self-sufficiency. Families and Societies Working Paper Series 7.
Thomson, E. (2014). Family complexity in Europe. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 245–258.
Thomson, E., Dahlberg, J., and Svallfors, S. (2019). Childbearing across partnerships in Europe. Paper presented at the Nordic Demographic Symposium, Reykyavik, Iceland.
Thomson, E., Lappegård, T., Carlson, M., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the United States, Norway, and Sweden. Demography 51(2): 485–508.
Tillman, K.H. (2008). Coresident sibling composition and the academic ability, expectations, and performance of youth. Sociological Perspectives 51(4): 679–711.
Turunen, J. (2014). Adolescent educational outcomes in blended families: Evidence from Swedish Register Data. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 55(7): 568–589.
Turunen, J. (2011). Entering a stepfamily: Children’s experience of family reconstitution in Sweden 1970‒2000. ZfF – Zeitschrift für Familienforschung / Journal of Family Research 23(2).
van der Heijden, F., Poortman, A.-R., and van der Lippe, T. (2016). Children’s postdivorce residence arrangements and parental experienced time pressure. Journal of Marriage and Family 78(2): 468–481.
van Houdt, K., Kalmijn, M., and Ivanova, K. (2018). Family complexity and adult children’s obligations: The role of divorce and co-residential history in norms to support parents and step-parents. European Sociological Review 34(2): 169–183.
Wells, M.B. and Bergnehr, D. (2014). Families and family policies in Sweden. In: Robila, M. (ed.). Handbook of family policies across the globe. New York: Springer: 91–107.
White, L. (1998). Who’s counting? Quasi-facts and stepfamilies in reports of number of siblings. Journal of Marriage and the Family 60(3): 725–733.
White, L.K. and Riedmann, A. (1992). When the Brady Bunch grows up: Step/half-and fullsibling relationships in adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family 51(1): 197–208.
Wiemers, E.E., Seltzer, J.A., Schoeni, R.F., Hotz, V.J., and Bianchi, S.M. (2019). Stepfamily structure and transfers between generations in U.S. families. Demography 56(1): 229–260.
Wolfe, B., Haveman, R., Ginther, D., and An, C.B. (1996). The ‘window problem’ in studies of children’s attainments: A methodological exploration. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(435): 970–982.