Volume 42 - Article 28 | Pages 777–798
Are sibling models a suitable tool in analyses of how reproductive factors affect child mortality?
References
Ball, S.J., Pereira, G., Jacoby, P., De Klerk, N., and Stanley, F.J. (2014). Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: Retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother. British Medical Journal 349: g4333.
Baqui, A.H., Ahmed, S., Begum, N., Khanam, R., Mohan, D., Harrison, M., and Ahmed, S. (2018). Impact of integrating a postpartum family planning program into a community-based maternal and newborn health program on birth spacing and preterm birth in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Global Health 8(2): 020406.
Barclay, K. and Kolk, M. (2017). The long-term cognitive and socioeconomic consequences of birth intervals: A within-family sibling comparison using Swedish register data. Demography 54(2): 459‒484.
Barclay, K. and Myrskylä, M. (2016). Advanced maternal age and offspring outcomes: Reproductive ageing and counterbalancing period trends. Population and Development Review 42(1): 69‒94.
Bousmah, M.A.Q. (2017). The effect of child mortality on fertility behaviors is non-linear: New evidence from Senegal. Review of Economics of the Household 15: 93‒113.
Class, Q.A., Rickert, M.E., Oberg, A.S., Sujan, A.C., Almqvist, C., Larsson, H., and DʼOnofrio, B.M. (2017). Within-family analysis of interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology 130(6): 1304‒1311.
Ewemade, J., Akinyemi, J., and DeWet, N. (2019). The effect of child death on birth spacing in Nigeria. Journal of Biosocial Science 52(3): 1‒8.
Hanley, G.E., Hutcheon, J.A., Kinniburgh, B.A., and Lee, L. (2017). Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology 129(3): 408‒415.
Kravdal, Ø. (2018). New evidence about effects of reproductive variables on child mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Population Studies 72(2): 139‒156.
Kravdal, Ø. (2019). Taking birth year into account when analysing effects of maternal age on child health and other outcomes: The value of a multilevel-multiprocess model compared to a sibling model. Demographic Research 40(43): 1249‒1290.
Molitoris, J. (2018). Heterogeneous effects of birth spacing on neonatal mortality risks in Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning 49(1): 3‒21.
Molitoris, J., Barclay, K., and Kolk, M. (2019). When and where birth spacing matters for child survival: An international comparison using the DHS. Demography 56: 1349‒1370.
Regan, A.K., Ball, S.J., Warren, J.L., Malacova, E., Padula, A., Marston, C., and Pereira, G.A. (2018). Population-based matched-sibling analysis estimating the associations between first interpregnancy interval and birth outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology 188(1): 9‒16.
Shachar, B.Z., Mayo, J.A., Lyell, D.J., Baer, R.J., Jeliffe‐Pawlowski, L.L., Stevenson, D.K., and Shaw, G.M. (2016). Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 123(12): 2009‒2017.
Sjölander, A., Frisell, T., Kuja-Halkola, R., Öberg, S., and Zetterqvist, J. (2016). Carryover effects in sibling comparison designs. Epidemiology 27(6): 852‒858.
Statistics Norway (2019). Life table 2018 [electronic resource].
van Soest, A. and Saha, U.R. (2018). Relationships between infant mortality, birth spacing and fertility in Matlab, Bangladesh. PloS One 13(4).