Volume 40 - Article 42 | Pages 1211–1248  

The changing pattern of cohabitation: A sequence analysis approach

By Paola Di Giulio, Roberto Impicciatore, Maria Sironi

References

Aassve, A., Billari, F.C., and Piccarreta, R. (2007). Strings of adulthood: A sequence analysis of young British women’s work-family trajectories. European Journal of Population 23(3–4): 369–388.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Abbott, A. (1995). Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Review of Sociology 21: 93–113.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Abbott, A. and Tsay, A. (2000). Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology. Sociological Methods and Research 29(1): 3–33.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bailey, K.D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Barban, N. and Sironi, M. (2018). Sequence analysis as a tool for family demography. In: Schoen, R. (ed.). Analytical family demography. Cham: Springer: 101–123.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernhardt, E. and Hoem, B. (1985). Cohabitation and social background: Trends observed for Swedish women born between 1936 and 1960. European Journal of Population 1(4): 375–395.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bianchi, S.M. and Casper, L.M. (2000). American families. Population Bulletin 55(4): 3–42.

Download reference:

Billari, F.C. (2001). Sequence analysis in demographic research. Canadian Studies in Population 28(2): 439–458.

Download reference:

Blom, S. (1994). Marriage and cohabitation in a changing society: Experience of Norwegian men and women born in 1945 and 1960. European Journal of Population 10(2): 143–173.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.-P., Klijzing, E., Mills, M., and Kurz, K. (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. London: Routledge.

Download reference:

Buchmann, M. (1989). The script of life in modern society: Entry into adulthood in a changing world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Download reference:

Bumpass, L.L. (1990). What’s happening to the family? Interaction between demographic and institutional change. Demography 27(4): 483–498.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Castiglioni, M. and Dalla-Zuanna, G. (2014). Spread of cohabitation and proximity between kin in contemporary Italy. Journal of Family History 39(4): 422–444.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(3): 403–419.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Knopf.

Download reference:

Dalla-Zuanna, G. (2001). The banquet of Aeolus: A familistic interpretation of Italy’s lowest low fertility. Demographic Research 4(5): 133–162.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Di Giulio, P. and Koytcheva, E. (2007). The changing meaning of cohabitation: An analysis of selected European countries. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Population Association of America, New York, USA, March 29–31, 2007.

Download reference:

Di Giulio, P. and Rosina, A. (2007). Intergenerational family ties and the diffusion of cohabitation in Italy. Demographic Research 16(14): 441–468.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Domínguez-Folgueras, M. and Castro-Martín, T. (2013). Cohabitation in Spain: No longer a marginal path to family formation. Journal of Marriage and Family 75(2): 422–437.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ekert-Jaffe, O. and Solaz, A. (2001). Unemployment, marriage, and cohabitation in France. The Journal of Socio-Economics 30(1): 75–98.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Elzinga, C.H. (2006). Sequence analysis: Metric representation of categorical time series. Sociological Methods and Research 38(3): 463–481.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Elzinga, C.H. (2003). Sequence similarity: A non-aligning technique. Sociological Methods and Research 32(1): 3–29.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Elzinga, C.H. and Liefbroer, A. (2007). De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population 23(3–4): 225–250.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eriksen, J. (2001). Unmarried cohabitation and family policy in Norway. International Review of Sociology 11(1): 63–74.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Policy Press.

Download reference:

Fulda, B.E. (2016). The diversity in longitudinal partnership trajectories during the transition to adulthood: How is it related to individual characteristics and regional living conditions? Demographic Research 35(37): 1101–1134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Furstenberg, F.F. Jr., Rumbaut, R.C., and Settersten, R.A. Jr. (2005). On the frontier of adulthood: Emerging themes and new directions. In: Settersten, R.A. Jr., Furstenberg, F.F. Jr., and Rumbaut, R.G. (eds.). On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 3–25.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Müller, N.S., and Studer, M. (2011). Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. Journal of Statistical Software 40(4): 1–37.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gabrielli, G. and Hoem, J.M. (2010). Italy’s non-negligible cohabitational unions. European Journal of Population 26(1): 33–46.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gauthier, A.H. (2002). Family policies in industrialized countries: Is there a convergence? Population 57(3): 447–474.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gauthier, A.H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review 26(3): 323–346.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gauthier, J.-A., Widmer, E.D., Bucher, P., and Notredame, C. (2010). Multichannel sequence analysis applied to social science data. Sociological Methodology 40(1): 1–38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guetto, R., Mancosu, M., Scherer, S., and Torricelli, G. (2016). The spreading of cohabitation as a diffusion process: Evidence from Italy. European Journal of Population 32(5): 661–686.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hart, R.K. and Lyngstad, T.H. (2016). Individualiserte livsløp? Et sekvensanalytisk blikk på samlivene til norske menn og kvinner født 1927–1966 [Individualization of the life course?]. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 57(2): 135–166.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J.M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family 66(5): 1214–1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P., Timberlake, J.M., and Furstenberg, F.F. Jr. (2003). Shifting childrearing to single mothers: Results from 17 Western countries. Population and Development Review 29(1): 47–71.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N. (2014). The different meanings of cohabitation across Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Download reference:

Hiekel, N. and Castro-Martín, T. (2014). Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. Journal of Marriage and the Family 76(3): 489–505.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A.C., and Poortman, A. (2014). Understanding diversity in the meaning of cohabitation across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 391–410.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hoem, J.M. and Kostova, D. (2007). Early traces of the second demographic transition in Bulgaria: A joint analysis of marital and non-marital union formation, 1960–2004. Population Studies 62(3): 259–271.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Impicciatore, R. (2015). The transition to adulthood of the Italian second generation in France. European Journal of Population 31(5): 529–560.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jalovaara, M. and Fasang, A.E. (2015). Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland? Demographic Research 33(44): 1241–1256.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population 27(3): 269–293.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kasearu, K. and Kutsar, D. (2011). Patterns behind unmarried cohabitation trends in Europe. European Societies 13(2): 307–325.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kennedy, S. and Ruggles, S. (2014). Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography 51(2): 587–598.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(1): 1–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Law and Policy 26(1): 33–55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood: Here to stay? European perspectives. In: Moynihan, D.P., Seeding, T.M., and Rainwater, L. (eds.). The future of the family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 66–95.

Download reference:

Kleinepier, T. and de Valk, H.A.G. (2016). Ethnic differences in family trajectories of young adult women in the Netherlands: Timing and sequencing of events. Demographic Research 35(24): 671–710.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Klüsener, S., Perelli-Harris, B., Sanchez Gassen, N.G., and Nora, E. (2013). Spatial aspects of the rise of nonmarital fertility across Europe since 1960: The role of states and regions in shaping patterns of change. 29 2(137–165).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Koytcheva, E. (2006). Social-demographic differences of fertility and union formation in Bulgaria before and after the start of the societal transition. [PhD thesis]. Rostock: University of Rostock.

Download reference:

Kuperberg, A. (2014). Age at coresidence, premarital cohabitation, and marital dissolution: 1985–2009. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(2): 352–369.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation. In: Oppenheim Mason, K. and Jensen, A.-M. (eds.). Gender and family changes in industrialized countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 17–62.

Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review 32(4): 669–698.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Dourlejin, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography 43(2): 203–221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Elzinga, C.H. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of behavioural patterns: How similar are parents’ and children’s demographic trajectories? Advances in Life Course Research 17(1): 1–10.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Smock, P.J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and the Family 67(4): 989–1002.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review 12(1): 53–65.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review 32(3): 485–510.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McGinnis, S. (2003). Cohabiting, dating and perceived cost of marriage: A model of marriage entry. Journal of Marriage and the Family 65(1): 105–116.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Micheli, G. (2000). Kinship, family and social network: The anthropological embedment of fertility change in Southern Europe. Demographic Research 3(13).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mureşan, C., Hărăguş, P.T., Hărăguş, M., and Schröder, C. (2008). Romania: Childbearing metamorphosis within a changing context. Demographic Research 19(3): 855–906.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. (2000). The evolution of cohabitation in Britain, 1960–1995. Population Studies 54(1): 43–56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mynarska, M. and Bernardi, L. (2007). Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation. Demographic Research 16(17): 519–554.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Naldini, M. (2003). The family in the Mediterranean welfare states. London: Frank Cass.

Download reference:

Nazio, T. and Blossfeld, H.-P. (2003). The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population 19(1): 47–82.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. (2014). How similar are cohabiting and married parents? Second conception risks by union type in the United States and across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 437–464.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Amos, M. (2015). Changes in partnership patterns across the life course: An examination of 14 countries in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research 33(6): 145–178.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Bernardi, L. (2015). Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture. Introduction to Special Collection: ‘Focus on partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia’. Demographic Research 33(25): 701–732.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Gerber, T.P. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing in Russia: Second Demographic Transition or pattern of disadvantage? Demography 48(1): 317–342.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Isupova, O., Mynarska, M., Keizer, R., Berrington, A., Klaerner, A., Berghammer, C., Evans, A., Lappegård, T., and Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research 31(34): 1043–1078.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., Sigle-Rushton, W., Keizer, R., Lappegård, T., Jasilioniene, A., and Di Giulio, P. (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood: An examination of 11 European countries. Population Studies 66(2): 167–182.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Sánchez Gassen, N. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., Berghammer, C., and Kreyenfeld, M. (2010). The educational gradient of non-marital childbearing in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pirani, E. and Vignoli, D. (2016). Changes in the satisfaction of cohabitors relative to spouses over time. Journal of Marriage and Family 7(3): 598–609.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pollock, G. (2007). Holistic trajectories: A study of combined employment, housing and family careers by using multiple-sequence analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 170(1): 167–183.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Potârcă, G., Mills, M., and Lesnard, L. (2013). Trajectoires de formation de la famille en Roumanie, en Fédération de Russie et en France: En direction de la seconde transition démographique? [Family formation trajectories in Romania, the Russian Federation and France: Towards the second demographic transition?]. European Journal of Population 29(1): 69–101.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Prinz, C. (1995). Cohabiting, married, or single: Portraying, analyzing and modeling new living arrangements in the changing societies of Europe. Aldershot: Avebury.

Download reference:

Reher, D.S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24(2): 203–234.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rijken, A.J. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2009). Influences of the family of origin on the timing and quantum of fertility in the Netherlands. Population Studies 63(1): 71–85.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rindfuss, R.R. and VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review 16(4): 703–726.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rosina, A. and Fraboni, R. (2004). Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy? Demographic Research 11(6): 149–172.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Seltzer, J.A. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of Marriage and the Family 66(4): 921–928.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Seltzer, J.A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62(4): 1247–1268.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sironi, M., Barban, N., and Impicciatore, R. (2015). Parental social class and the transition to adulthood in Italy and the United States. Advances in Life Course Research 26: 89–104.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smock, P.J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. 26: 1–20. doi:. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 1Ǿ20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85–138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T., Zeman, K., and Kantorová, V. (2003). Demographic shifts in the Czech Republic after 1989: A second demographic transition view. European Journal of Population 19(3): 249–277.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spéder, Z. (2005). The rise of cohabitation as first union and some neglected factors of recent demographic developments in Hungary. Demográfia 49(5): 77–103.

Download reference:

Sweeney, M., Castro-Martín, T., and Mills, M. (2015). The reproductive context of cohabitation in comparative perspective: Contraceptive use in United States, Spain, and France. Demographic Research 32(5): 147–182.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Syltevik, L.J. (2010). Sense and sensibility: Cohabitation in ‘cohabitation land.’. Sociological Review 58(3): 444–462.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A. and Philipov, D. (2009). Sweeping changes in marriage, cohabitation and childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New insights from the developmental idealism framework. European Journal of Population 25(2): 123–156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tobío, C. (2001). Marriage, cohabitation and the residential independence of young people in Spain. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(1): 68–87.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Trost, J.E. (1978). A renewed social institution: Non-marital cohabitation. Acta Sociologica 29(4): 303–315.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin 42(1): 1–59.

Download reference:

Vignoli, D., Tocchioni, V., and Salvini, S. (2016). Uncertain lives: Insights into the role of job precariousness in union formation in Italy. Demographic Research 35(10): 253–282.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1991). From marriage to informal union: Recent changes in the behaviour of French couples. Population 3: 81–111.

Download reference:

Vitali, A., Aassve, A., and Lappegård, T. (2015). Diffusion of childbearing within cohabitation. Demography 52(2): 355–377.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vogel, J. (2002). European welfare regimes and the transition to adulthood: A comparative and longitudinal perspective. Social Indicators Research 59(3): 275–299.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A. (2009). ‘You’d better wait!’ Socio-economic background and timing of first marriage versus first cohabitation. European Sociological Review 25(2): 139–153.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Willoughby, B.J., Carroll, J.S., and Busby, D.M. (2012). The different effects of ‘living together’: Determining and comparing types of cohabiting couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 29(3): 397–419.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article