Volume 39 - Article 10 | Pages 315–336  

The influence of the number of siblings on expected family size in a cohort of young adults in Germany

By Petra Buhr, Katharina Lutz, Timo Peter

References

Axinn, W.G., Clarkberg, M.E., and Thornton, A. (1994). Family influences on family size preferences. Demography 31(1): 65–79.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Barber, J.S. (2000). Intergenerational influences on the entry into parenthood: Mothers’ preferences for family and nonfamily behavior. Social Forces 79(1): 319–348.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Barber, J.S. (2001). The intergenerational transmission of age at first birth among married and unmarried men and women. Social Science Research 30(2): 219–247.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bhrolcháin, M.N. and 2015Beaujouan, E. (2015). How real are reproductive goals? Uncertainty and the construction of fertility preferences. Southampton: ESRC Centre for Population Change (Working Paper 73).

Download reference:

Brüderl, J., Hank, K., Huinink, J., Nauck, B., Neyer, F.J., Walper, S., Alt, P., Buhr, P., Castiglioni, L., Finn, C., Hajek, K., Herzig, M., Huyer-May, B., Lenke, R., Müller, B., Peter, T., Salzburger, V., Schmiedeberg, C., Schubach, E., Schütze, P., Schumann, N., Thönnissen, C., and Wilhelm, B. (2015). The German family panel (pairfam): Data file version 6.0.0 [dataset] [electronic resource]. Cologne: GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Buhr, P. and Huinink, J. (2015). The German low fertility: How we got there and what we can expect for the future. European Sociological Review 31(2): 197–210.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Buhr, P., Huinink, J., Boehnke, M., and Maul, K. (2011). Kinder oder keine? Institutionelle Rahmenbedingungen und biographische Voraussetzungen für die Familiengründung und -erweiterung in Ost- und Westdeutschland. In: Brüderl, J., Castiglioni, L., and Schumann, N. (eds.). Partnerschaft, Fertilität und intergenerationale Beziehungen: Ergebnisse der ersten Welle des Beziehungs- und Familienpanels. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag: 175–201.

Download reference:

Heiland, F., Prskawetz, A., and Sanderson, W.C. (2008). Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data. European Journal of Population 24(2): 129–156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Huinink, J. (1987). Soziale Herkunft, Bildung und das Alter bei der Geburt des ersten Kindes. Zeitschrift fur Soziologie 16(5): 367–384.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L., and Feldhaus, M. (2011). Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 23(1): 77–101.

Download reference:

Kahn, J.R. and Anderson, K.E. (1992). Intergenerational patterns of teenage fertility. Demography 29(1): 39–57.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kolk, M. (2014a). Multigenerational transmission of family size in contemporary Sweden. Population Studies 68(1): 111–129.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kolk, M. (2014b). Understanding transmission of fertility across multiple generations: Socialization or socioeconomics? Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 35: 89–103.

Weblink:
Download reference:

König, W., Lüttinger, P., and Müller, W. (1988). A comparative analysis of the development and structure of educational systems: Methodological foundations and the construction of a comparative educational scale. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften (CASMIN Working Paper 12).

Download reference:

Kreyenfeld, M. and Konietzka, D. (2017). Childlessness in East and West Germany: Long-term trends and social disparities. In: Kreyenfeld, M. and Konietzka, D. (eds.). Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, causes, and consequences. Cham: Springer: 97–114.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kuhnt, A.-K. and Buhr, P. (2016). Biographical risks and their impact on uncertainty in fertility expectations: A gender-specific study based on the German Family Panel. Duisburg: Institut für Soziologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen.

Download reference:

Michael, R.T. and Tuma, N.B. (1985). Entry into marriage and parenthood by young men and women: The influence of family background. Demography 22(4): 514–544.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review 26(1): 67–82.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, S.P. (1982). Parity-specific fertility intentions and uncertainty: The United States, 1970 to 1976. Demography 19(3): 315–334.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. (2013). Cross-national patterns of intergenerational continuities in childbearing in developed countries. Biodemography and Social Biology 59(2): 101–126.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. and Knudsen, L.B. (2002). The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: The effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female. Population Studies 56(3): 235–248.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. and Wang, D. (2001). Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies. European Journal of Population 17(1): 75–96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Philipov, D. (2009). Fertility intentions and outcomes: The role of policies to close the gap. European Journal of Population 25(4): 355–361.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Philipov, D. and Berghammer, C. (2007). Religion and fertility ideals, intentions and behaviour: A comparative study of European countries. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007(5): 271–305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Régnier-Loilier, A. (2006). Influence of own sibship size on the number of children desired at various times of life: The case of France. Population 61(3): 165–194.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rijken, A.J. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2009). Influences of the family of origin on the timing and quantum of fertility in the Netherlands. Population Studies 63(1): 71–85.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rindfuss, R.R. and John, C.S. (1983). Social determinants of age at first birth. Journal of Marriage and Family 45(3): 553–565.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ruckdeschel, K. (2004). Determinanten des Kinderwunsches in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 29(3–4): 363–386.

Download reference:

Steenhof, L. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2008). Intergenerational transmission of age at first birth in the Netherlands for birth cohorts born between 1935 and 1984: Evidence from municipal registers. Population Studies 62(1): 69–84.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Testa, M.R. (2007). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: Evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007(1): 357–379.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A. (1980). The influence of first generation fertility and economic status on second generation fertility. Population and Environment 3(1): 51–72.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Winkle, Z., Fasang, A., and Raab, M. (2016). Intergenerational patterns of family formation in East and West Germany. In: Ritschard, G. and Studer, M. (eds.). Proceedings of the International Conference on Sequence Analysis and Related Methods. Lausanne: Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research: 509–534.

Download reference:

Westoff, C.F. and Potvin, R.H. (1967). College women and fertility values. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article