Volume 38 - Article 12 | Pages 287–308
Factors explaining the North–South differentials in contraceptive use in Nigeria: A nonlinear decomposition analysis
By Stella Babalola, Olamide Oyenubi
Abstract
Background: Northern Nigeria has some of the worst reproductive health indicators worldwide. Conspicuous North–South variations exist in contraceptive use; not much is known about the drivers of contraceptive use disparities in the North compared to the South.
Objective: In this study, we examine the relative weights of the factors that contribute to this North–South gap in contraceptive prevalence.
Methods: Using the women’s 2013 Demographic Health Survey dataset, we applied a nonlinear decomposition technique to determine the contribution of sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics, conjugal relationship dynamics, intimate partner violence, ideational variables, and Islamic culture to the North–South disparities in contraceptive use.
Results: There was a gap of 12.4 percentage points in contraceptive prevalence between the north and south of Nigeria (5.2% vs 17.6%). The largest contributors to the gap were ideational characteristics (explaining 42.0% of the gap) and socio-economic profiles (explaining 42.6%). Patterns of conjugal relationship dynamics (11.1%), socio-demographic characteristics (‒11.0%), Islamic religious culture (7.6%), and exposure to family planning messaging (6.1%) were also significant contributors.
Conclusions: Effective interventions to increase contraceptive use in northern Nigeria should aim at addressing socioeconomic disadvantage in the North, impacting ideational characteristics and specifically targeting poor women and those with low levels of education. Working with Islamic religious leaders is also critical to bridging the gap.
Contribution: This paper broadens the knowledge on the determinants of contraceptive use in Nigeria by identifying contextual factors that operate differently in the North compared to the South.
Author's Affiliation
- Stella Babalola - Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States of America EMAIL
- Olamide Oyenubi - Johns Hopkins University, United States of America EMAIL
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
Trends in the completeness of birth registration in Nigeria: 2002-2010
Volume 35 - Article 12
Ideation and intention to use contraceptives in Kenya and Nigeria
Volume 33 - Article 8
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
Predictive utility of key family planning indicators on dynamic contraceptive outcomes: Results from longitudinal surveys in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Uganda, and Côte d'Ivoire
Volume 50 - Article 45
| Keywords:
contraception,
contraceptive adoption,
contraceptive discontinuation,
contraceptive use,
family planning,
longitudinal data,
methods,
panel data,
Performance and Monitoring for Action (PMA) surveys,
sub-Saharan Africa
A new look at contraceptive prevalence plateaus in sub-Saharan Africa: A probabilistic approach
Volume 50 - Article 31
| Keywords:
contraceptive prevalence plateaus,
demand for family planning,
family planning,
modern contraceptive prevalence,
probabilistic model
Religion and contraceptive use in Kazakhstan: A study of mediating mechanisms
Volume 50 - Article 21
| Keywords:
contraceptive use,
Generations and Gender Programme (GGP),
Kazakhstan,
mediation,
religion,
religiosity
Does the fulfillment of contraceptive method preferences affect contraceptive continuation? Evidence from urban Kenya, Nigeria, and Senegal
Volume 50 - Article 5
| Keywords:
contraceptive discontinuation,
contraceptive dynamics,
contraceptive preferences,
contraceptive use,
family planning,
patient-centered approach,
preferences
Calculating contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning in low-fertility countries with the Generations and Gender Survey
Volume 49 - Article 21
| Keywords:
cross-national study,
Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS),
Europe,
family planning,
Fertility and Family Survey (FFS),
Generations and Gender Survey (GGS),
longitudinal data,
panel data,
unplanned births,
World Fertility Survey
Cited References: 56
Download to Citation Manager
PubMed
Google Scholar