Volume 37 - Article 56 | Pages 1793–1824  

The wage penalty for motherhood: Evidence on discrimination from panel data and a survey experiment for Switzerland

By Daniel Oesch, Oliver Lipps, Patrick McDonald

References

Auspurg, K. and Hinz, T. (2015). Factorial survey experiments, quantitative applications in the social sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., and Sauer, C. (2017). Why should women get less? Evidence on the gender pay gap from multifactorial survey experiments. American Sociological Review 82(1): 179‒210.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81(4): 813‒846.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Budig, M. and England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review 66(2): 204‒225.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Budig, M. and Hodges, M. (2010). Differences in disadvantage: Variation in the motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution. American Sociological Review 775(5): 705‒728.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cooke, L. (2014). Gendered parenthood penalties and premiums across the earnings distribution in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. European Sociological Review 30(3): 360‒372.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Correll, S., Benard, S., and Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Sociological Review 112(5): 1297‒1339.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Denny, K. (2016). Workplace evaluations of parents by race: Unraveling perceptual penalties and premiums. Time-Sharing Experiments from the Social Sciences .

Weblink:
Download reference:

Di Stasio, V. (2014). Education as a signal of trainability: Results from a vignette study with Italian employers. European Sociological Review 30(4): 796–809.

Weblink:
Download reference:

England, P., Bearak, J., Budig, M., and Hodges, M. (2016). Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty? American Sociological Review 81(6): 1161‒1189.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Firebaugh, G. (2008). Seven rules for social research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Download reference:

Fuller, S. (2017). Segregation across workplaces and the motherhood wage gap: Why do mothers work in low-wage establishments? Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Working paper.

Download reference:

Gangl, M. and Ziefle, A. (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United Sates. Demography 46(2): 341‒369.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gash, V. (2009). Sacrificing their careers for their families? An analysis of the penalty to motherhood in Europe. Social Indicators Research 93(3): 569‒586.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Glauber, R. (2007). Marriage and the motherhood wage penalty among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Marriage and Family 69(4): 951‒961.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Groves, R.M. (2004). Survey errors and survey costs. Hoboken: Wiley.

Download reference:

Harkness, S. (2016). The effect of motherhood and lone motherhood on the employment and earnings of British women: A lifecycle approach. European Sociological Review 32(6): 850‒863.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jacobs, J. and Steinberg, R. (1990). Compensating differentials and the male‒female wage gap: Evidence from the New York State Comparable Worth Study. Social Forces 69(2): 439‒468.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kahn, J., García-Manglano, J., and Bianchi, S. (2014). The motherhood penalty at midlife: Long-term effects of children on women’s careers. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(1): 56‒72.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Killewald, A. and Gough, M. (2013). Does specialization explain marriage penalties and premiums? American Sociological Review 778(3): 477‒502.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Krüger, H. and Levy, R. (2001). Linking life courses, work and the family: Theorising a not so visible nexus between women and men. Canadian Journal of Sociology 26(2): 145‒166.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liechti, F., Fossati, F., Bonoli, G., and Auer, D. (2017). The signaling value of labor market programs. European Sociological Review 33(2): 257‒274.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, A. and Swaffield, J. (2008). The gender gap in early-career wage growth. Economic Journal 118(530): 983‒1024.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, L. and Arthur, M. (2005). Methodological considerations in estimating the gender pay gap for employed professionals. Sociological Methods and Research 33(3): 383‒403.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mu, Z. and Xie, Y. (2016). ‘Motherhood penalty’ and ‘fatherhood premium’? Fertility effects on parents in China. Demographic Research 35(47): 1373‒1410.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, E. and Oesch, D. (2016). The feminization of occupations and change in wages: A panel analysis of Britain, Germany, and Switzerland. Social Forces 94(3): 1221–1255.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Office fédéral des statistiques (OFS) (2016). Indicateurs du marché du travail 2016. Neuchâtel: OFS.

Download reference:

Petersen, T., Penner, A., and Høgsnes, G. (2014). From motherhood penalties to husband premia: The new challenge for gender equality and family policy, lessons from Norway. American Journal of Sociology 119(5): 1434‒1472.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Polavieja, J. (2012). Socially-embedded investments: Explaining gender differences in job-specific skills. American Journal of Sociology 118(3): 592‒634.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rossi, P. and Nock, S. (1982). Measuring social judgements: The factorial survey approach. Los Angeles: Sage.

Download reference:

Voorpostel, M., Tillmann, R., Lebert, F., Kuhn, U., Lipps, O., Ryser, V.-A., Schmid, F., Antal, E., Monsch, G.-A., and Wernli, B. (2016). Swiss Household Panel Userguide (1999‒2015), Wave 17, December 2016. Lausanne: FORS.

Download reference:

Weeden, K., Cha, Y., and Bucca, M. (2016). Long hours, part-time work, and trends in the gender gap in pay, the motherhood wage penalty, and the fatherhood wage premium. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2(4): 71‒102.

Download reference:

Back to the article