Volume 37 - Article 28 | Pages 889–916
The timing of abortions, births, and union dissolutions in Finland
References
Aassve, A., Burgess, S., Propper, C., and Dickson, M. (2006). Employment, family union and childbearing decisions in Great Britain. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 169(4): 781–804.
Balbo, N., Billari, F.C., and Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population 19(1): 1–38.
Bankole, A., Singh, S., and Haas, T. (1998). Reasons why women have induced abortions: Evidence from 27 countries. International Family Planning Perspectives 24(3): 117–152.
Becker, G.S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Berg, V., Rotkirch, A., Väisänen, H., and Jokela, M. (2013). Personality is differentially associated with planned and non-planned pregnancies. Journal of Research in Personality 47(4): 296–305.
Berrington, A. (2001). Entry into parenthood and the outcome of cohabiting partnerships in Britain. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(1): 80–96.
Browne, W.J. (2015). MCMC estimation in MLwiN [electronic resource]. Bristol: University of Bristol.
Browne, W.J. (2009). MCMC estimation in MLwiN v2.1 [electronic resource]. Bristol: University of Bristol.
Browne, W.J., Steele, F., Golalizadeh, M., and Green, M.J. (2009). The use of simple reparameterizations to improve the efficiency of Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation for multilevel models with applications to discrete time survival models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 172(3): 579–598.
Chibber, K.S., Biggs, M.A., Roberts, S.C.M., and Foster, D.G. (2014). The role of intimate partners in women’s reasons for seeking abortion. Women’s Health Issues 24(1): e131–e138.
Ellison, C.G., Echevarría, S., and Smith, B. (2005). Religion and abortion attitudes among U.S. Hispanics: Findings from the 1990 Latino National Political Survey. Social Science Quarterly 86(1): 192–208.
Finer, L.B., Frohwirth, L.F., Dauphinee, L.A., Singh, S., and Moore, A.M. (2005). Reasons U.S. women have abortions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 37(3): 110–118.
FINLEX (2013). Laki raskauden keskeyttämisestä [Act on pregnancy termination] 24.3.1970/239 [electronic resource].
Forssén, K., Laukkanen, A.-M., and Ritakallio, V.-M. (2003). Policy: The case of Finland. Paper presented at the Welfare Policy and Employment in the Context of Family Change, Utrecht, the Netherlands, October 8–9, 2003.
Frejka, T. and Westoff, C.F. (2007). Religion, religiousness and fertility in the US and in Europe. European Journal of Population 24(1): 5–31.
Haataja, A. (2006). Nordic breadwinner–caretaker models: Comparison of Finland and Sweden. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
Hansen, M.-L.H., Mølgaard-Nielsen, D., Knudsen, L.B., and Keiding, N. (2009). Rates of induced abortion in Denmark according to age, previous births and previous abortions. Demographic Research 21(22): 647–680.
Heaton, T., Jacobson, C., and Holland, K. (1999). Persistence and change in decisions to remain childless. Journal of Marriage and Family 61(2): 531–539.
Hess, J.A. and Rueb, J.D. (2005). Attitudes toward abortion, religion, and party affiliation among college students. Current Psychology 24(1): 24–42.
Hoem, J.M., Jalovaara, M., and Muresan, C. (2013). Recent fertility patterns of Finnish women by union status: A descriptive account. Demographic Research 28(14): 409–420.
Holland, J.A. (2011). Home and where the heart is: Marriage timing and joint home purchase. European Journal of Population 28(1): 65–89.
Jalovaara, M. (2012). Socio-economic resources and first-union formation in Finland, cohorts born 1969–81. Population Studies 66(1): 69–85.
Johnson-Hanks, J., Bachrach, C.A., Morgan, S.P., and Kohler, H.-P. (2011). Understanding family change and variation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
KELA (2012). Social insurance institution: Parental allowance.
Kirkman, M., Rowe, H., Hardiman, A., Mallett, S., and Rosenthal, D. (2009). Reasons women give for abortion: A review of the literature. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 12(6): 365–378.
Knudsen, L.B., Gissler, M., Bender, S.S., Hedberg, C., Ollendorff, U., Sundström, K., Totlandsdal, K., and Vilhjalmsdottir, S. (2003). Induced abortion in the Nordic countries: Special emphasis on young women. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 82(3): 257–268.
Kontula, O. (2010). The evolution of sex education and students’ sexual knowledge in Finland in the 2000s. Sex Education 10(4): 373–386.
Kosunen, E. (2000). Family planning services. In: Lottes, I. and Kontula, O. (eds.). New views on sexual health: The case of Finland. Helsinki: Väestöliitto: 70–84.
Kravdal, Ø. (2001). The high fertility of college educated women in Norway: An artefact of the separate modelling of each parity transition. Demographic Research 5(6): 187–216.
Kreyenfeld, M. (2919). Uncertainties in female employment careers and the postponement of parenthood in Germany. European Sociological Review 26(3): 351–366.
Lappegård, T. and Noack, T. (2015). The link between parenthood and partnership in contemporary Norway: Findings from focus group research. Demographic Research 31(9): 287–310.
Lappegård, T. and Rønsen, M. (2005). The multifaceted impact of education on entry into motherhood. European Journal of Population 21(1): 31–49.
Leckie, G. and Charlton, C. (2013). runmlwin: A program to run the MLwiN multilevel modelling software from within Stata. Journal of Statistical Software 52(11): 1–40.
Leone, T. and Hinde, A. (2007). Fertility and union dissolution in Brazil: An example of multi-process modelling using the Demographic and Health Survey calendar data. Demographic Research 17(7): 157–180.
Lillard, L.A. (1993). Simultaneous equations for hazards. Journal of Econometrics 56(1–2): 189–217.
Lillard, L.A. and Waite, L.J. (1993). A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption. Demography 30(4): 653–681.
Lyngstad, T.H., Noack, T., and Tufte, P.A. (2011). Pooling of economic resources: A comparison of Norwegian married and cohabiting couples. European Sociological Review 27(5): 624–635.
Lyngstad, T.H. and Skardhamar, T. (2011). Nordic register data and their untapped potential for criminological knowledge. Crime and Justice 40(1): 613–645.
Mauldon, J., Foster, D.G., and Roberts, S.C.M. (2015). Effect of abortion vs. carrying to term on a woman’s relationship with the man involved in the pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 47(1): 11–18.
McQuillan, K. (2004). When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review 30(1): 25–56.
Nisén, J., Martikainen, P., Kaprio, J., and Silventoinen, K. (2013). Educational differences in completed fertility: A behavioral genetic study of Finnish male and female twins. Demography 50(4): 1399–1420.
Official Statistics of Finland (2012). Births [electronic resource]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
Oppenheimer, V.K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review 20(2): 293–342.
Perelli-Harris, B. (2014). How similar are cohabiting and married parents? Second conception risks by union type in the United States and across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 437–464.
Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berrington, A., Berghammer, C., Evans, A., Isupova, O., Keizer, R., Klärner, A., Lappegård, T., and Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research 31(34): 1043–1078.
Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W.J., Healy, M., and Cameron, B. (2009). MLwiN Version 2.1 [electronic resource]. Bristol: University of Bristol.
Regushevskaya, E., Dubikaytis, T., Laanpere, M., Nikula, M., Kuznetsova, O., Haavio-Mannila, E., Karro, H., and Hemminki, E. (2009). Risk factors for induced abortions in St Petersburg, Estonia and Finland: Results from surveys among women of reproductive age. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 14(3): 176–186.
Steele, F., Goldstein, H., and Browne, W. (2004). A general multilevel multistate competing risks model for event history data, with an application to a study of contraceptive use dynamics. Statistical Modelling 4(2): 145–159.
Steele, F., Kallis, C., Goldstein, H., and Joshi, H. (2005). The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain. Demography 42(4): 647–673.
Väisänen, H. (2016). Educational inequalities in repeat abortion: A longitudinal register study in Finland 1975–2010. Journal of Biosocial Science 48(6): 820–832.
Väisänen, H. (2015). The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland. Population Studies 69(3): 373–388.
Väisänen, H. and Murphy, M. (2014). Social inequalities in teenage fertility outcomes: Childbearing and abortion trends of three birth cohorts in Finland. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 46(2): 109116.
Vikat, A. (2004). Women’s labor force attachment and childbearing in Finland. Demographic Research S3(8): 177–212.
Vikat, A., Kosunen, E., and Rimpelä, M. (2002). Risk of postpartum induced abortion in Finland: A register-based study. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 34(2): 84–90.
White, L. and McQuillan, J. (2006). No longer intending: The relationship between relinquished fertility intentions and distress. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(2): 478–490.