Volume 37 - Article 14 | Pages 414–454  

Supportive families versus support from families: The decision to have a child in the Netherlands

By Susan Schaffnit, Rebecca Sear

Abstract

Background: Support from families can reduce costs of reproduction and may therefore be associated with higher fertility for men and women. Family supportiveness, however, varies both between families – some families are more supportive than others – and within families over time – as the needs of recipients and the abilities of support givers change. Distinguishing the effects of time-invariant between-family supportiveness and time-varying within-family supportiveness on fertility can help contribute to an understanding of how family support influences fertility.

Objective: We distinguish 'between' and 'within' families for several types of support shared between parents and adult children and test whether between- and within-family variation in support associates with birth timings.

Methods: We use seven years of annually collected LISS panel data from the Netherlands on 2,288 reproductive-aged men and women to investigate the timing of first and subsequent births.

Results: We find between-family support is more often associated with fertility than is within-family support, particularly for first births and for women. Emotional support is generally associated with earlier first births for both men and women, while results for financial and reciprocal emotional support are mixed. There is some indication that the latter kind of support positively predicts births for men and negatively for women.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that feeling supported may be more important than actual support in reproductive decision-making in this high-income setting.

Contribution: We apply a method novel to human demography to address both a conceptual and methodological issue in studies of families and fertility.

Author's Affiliation

• Susan Schaffnit - University of California, Santa Barbara, United States of America EMAIL
• Rebecca Sear - Brunel University London, United Kingdom EMAIL

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Transitions to adulthood in men and women in rural Malawi in the 21st century using sequence analysis: Some evidence of delay
Volume 51 - Article 14

Earning their keep? Fostering, children's education, and work in north-western Tanzania
Volume 41 - Article 10

Does grandparental help mediate the relationship between kin presence and fertility?
Volume 34 - Article 17

Does the kin orientation of a British woman’s social network influence her entry into motherhood?
Volume 28 - Article 11

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

Educational trends in cohort fertility by birth order: A comparison of England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland
Volume 51 - Article 36    | Keywords: birth order, cohort analysis, cross-national study, England, family size, fertility, Northern Ireland, parity, Scotland, Wales

Higher incomes are increasingly associated with higher fertility: Evidence from the Netherlands, 2008–2022
Volume 51 - Article 26    | Keywords: fertility, income, inequalities, Netherlands, parenthood

KINMATRIX: A new data resource for studies of families and kinship
Volume 51 - Article 25    | Keywords: family, networks, solidarity, survey methodology, transmission

The short- and long-term determinants of fertility in Uruguay
Volume 51 - Article 10    | Keywords: fertility, panel data, stages of female reproductive life, time series, Uruguay

Between money and intimacy: Brideprice, marriage, and women’s position in contemporary China
Volume 50 - Article 46    | Keywords: brideprice, China, divorce, family, family law, gender inequalities, marriage