Volume 35 - Article 45 | Pages 1317–1342  

The diffusion of cohabitation and children’s risks of family dissolution in Canada

By David Pelletier

References

Axinn, W.G. and Thornton, A. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence? Demography 29(3): 357‒374.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujot, R. (2000). Les deux transitions démographiques du Québec, 1860‒1996. Cahiers québécois de démographie 29(2): 201‒230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Binette Charbonneau, A. (2014). Mariages et nuptialité. In: Girard, C. (ed.). Le bilan démographique du Québec. Édition 2014. Quebec: Institut de la statistique du Québec: 97‒111.

Download reference:

Dumas, J. and Bélanger, A. (1997). Common-law unions in Canada at the end of the 20th century. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Report on the demographic situation in Canada 1996.

Download reference:

Elections Canada (2011). Table 9: Percentage of valid votes by political affiliation [electronic resource].

Jensen, A.-M. and Clausen, S.-E. (2003). Children and family dissolution in Norway: The impact of consensual unions. Childhood 10(1): 65‒81.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Juby, H. and Marcil-Gratton, N. (2002). It’s all in the past? Exploring the repercussions of parents’ early conjugal and parental histories on the family life course of their children. Ottawa: Report to Human Resources Development Canada.

Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, issues and implications. In: Booth, A. and Crouter, A.C. (eds.). Just living together. Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy. Mahwah: Erlbaum: 3‒31.

Download reference:

Kulu, H. (2012). Spatial variation in divorce and separation: Compositional or contextual effects? Population, Space and Place 18(1): 1‒15.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Laplante, B. (2014). Normative groups: The rise of the formation of the first union through cohabitation in Quebec, a comparative approach. Population Research and Policy Review 33(2): 257‒285.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Laplante, B. (2006). The rise of cohabitation in Quebec: Power of religion and power over religion. Canadian Journal of Sociology 31(1): 1‒24.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Laplante, B. and Fostik, A.L. (2015). Disentangling the Quebec fertility paradox: The recent evolution of fertility within marriage and consensual union in Quebec and Ontario. Canadian Studies in Population 42(1‒2): 81‒101.

Download reference:

Lardoux, S. and Pelletier, D. (2012). Trajectoire conjugale des parents et rendement scolaire des enfants en première année du primaire. Cahiers québécois de démographie 41(2): 373‒416.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Le Bourdais, C. and Lapierre-Adamcyk, É. (2004). Changes in conjugal life in Canada: Is cohabitation progressively replacing marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 929‒942.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Le Bourdais, C. and Marcil-Gratton, N. (1996). Family transformations across the Canadian/American border: When the laggard becomes the leader. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 27: 415‒436.

Download reference:

Le Bourdais, C., Neill, G., and Marcil-Gratton, N. (2000). L’effet du type d’union sur la stabilité des familles dites «intactes». Recherches sociographiques 41(1): 53‒74.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review 32(4): 669‒698.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Neidert, L. (2009). US presidential elections and the spatial pattern of the American second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 35(2): 391‒400.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography 43(2): 203‒221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lillard, L.A., Brien, M.J., and Waite, L.J. (1995). Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital dissolution: A matter of self-selection? Demography 32(3): 437‒457.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lyngstad, T.H. (2011). Does community context have an important impact on divorce risk? A fixed-effects study of twenty Norwegian first-marriage cohorts. European Journal of Population 27(1): 57‒77.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D., Smock, P.J., and Majumdar, D. (2004). The relative stability of cohabiting and marital unions for children. Population Research and Policy Review 23(2): 135‒159.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Osborne, C., Manning, W.D., and Smock, P.J. (2007). Married and cohabiting parents’ relationship stability: A focus on race and ethnicity. Journal of Marriage and Family 69(5): 1345‒1366.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Osborne, C. and McLanahan, S. (2007). Partnership instability and child well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family 69(4): 1065‒1083.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schnor, C. (2014). The effect of union status at first childbirth on union stability: Evidence from Eastern and Western Germany. European Journal of Population 30(2): 129‒160.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schoen, R. (1992). First unions and the stability of first marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family 54(2): 281‒284.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Statistics Canada (2016). Table 102-4506: Live births, by marital status of mother, Canada, provinces and territories, annual [electronic resource].

Statistics Canada (2013). Table 202-0402: Distribution of total income of individuals, 2011 constant dollars, annual [electronic resource].

Statistics Canada (2015). Table: Mother tongue (8), age groups (25) and sex (3) for the population of Canada, provinces, territories and federal electoral districts (2003 representation order), 2011 Census [electronic resource].

Download reference:

Tach, L. and Edin, K. (2013). The compositional and institutional sources of union dissolution for married and unmarried parents in the United States. Demography 50(5): 1789‒1818.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Valkonen, T., Blomgren, J., Kauppinen, T.M., Martikainen, P., and Maenpaa, E. (2008). The effects of socioeconomic and cultural characteristics of regions on the spatial patterns of the second demographic transition in Finland. Demographic Research 19(61): 2043‒2056.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vitali, A., Aassve, A., and Lappegård, T. (2015). Diffusion of childbearing within cohabitation. Demography 52(2): 355‒377.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article