Volume 34 - Article 23 | Pages 657–688
Types of social networks and the transition to parenthood
By Daniel Lois
References
Arránz Becker, O., Lois, D., and Nauck, B. (2010). Differences in fertility patterns between East and West German women. Disentangling the roles of cultural background and of the transformation process. Comparative Population Studies – Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 35: 7–34.
Asch, S.E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American 19: 31–35.
Axinn, W.G., Clarkberg, M.E., and Thornton, A. (1994). Family influences on family size preferences. Demography 31: 65–79.
Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., and Weiber, R. (2006). Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Balbo, N. and Barban, N. (2014). Does fertility spread among friends? American Sociological Review 79: 412–431.
Balbo, N. and Mills, M. (2011). The effects of social capital and social pressure on the intention to have a second or third child in France, Germany, and Bulgaria, 2004–05. Population Studies 65: 335–351.
Balbo, N. and Mills, M. (2012). The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility intentions. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 179–206.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bernardi, L. (2003). Channels of social influence on reproduction. Population Research and Policy Review 22: 527–555.
Bernardi, L., Keim, S., and Lippe, H.v.d. (2007). Social influences on fertility: A comparative mixed methods study in Eastern and Western Germany. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 23–47.
Bernardi, L. and Klärner, A. (2014). Social networks and fertility. Demographic Research 30: 641–670.
Blossfeld, H.-P. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology 97: 143–168.
Blossfeld, H.-P., Klijzing, E., Pohl, K., and Rohwer, G. (1999). Why do cohabiting couples marry? An example of an causal event history approach to interdependent systems. Quality and Quantity 33: 229–242.
Bongaarts, J. and Watkins, S.C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review 22: 639–682.
Bott, E. (1957). Family and social network. Roles, norms, and external relationships in ordinary urban families. London: Travistock Publications.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J.G. (ed.). The handbook of theory: Research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press: 241-258.
Brüderl, J., Hajek, K., Huyer-May, B., Ludwig, V., Müller, B., Müller, U., Passet, J., Pforr, K., Scholten, M., Schütze, P., and Schumann, N. (2013). Pairfam data manual. Release 4.0. Munich: University of Munich.
Bühler, C. and Fratczak, E. (2007). Learning from others and receiving support: The impact of personal networks on fertility intentions in Poland. European Societies 9: 359–382.
Bühler, C. and Kohler, H.-P. (2004). Der Einfluss starker Beziehungen auf die Nutzung moderner Kontrazeptiva in Kenia. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 33: 5–25.
Burt, R.S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92: 1287–1335.
Calinski, T. and Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in statistics 3: 1–27.
Diewald, M. and Lüdicke, J. (2006). Community lost or freedom gained? Changes of social networks after 1989. In: Diewald, M., Goedicke, A., and Mayer, K.U. (eds.). After the fall of the wall. East German life courses in transition. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 191–213.
Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M., and Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., Back, K., Bauer, C., and Woods, R. (1950). Social pressure in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper.
Fried, E.S. and Udry, J.R. (1980). Normative pressure on fertility planning. Population and Environment 3: 199–209.
Friedman, D., Hechter, M., and Kanazawa, S. (1994). A theory of the Value of Children. Demography 31: 375–401.
Gibbs, J.P. and Poston Jr, D.L. (1975). The devision of labor: Conceptualization and related measures. Social Forces 53: 468–476.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.
Guo, G. (1993). Event-history analysis for left-truncated data. Sociological Methodology 23: 217–243.
Hank, K. and Kreyenfeld, M. (2003). A multilevel analysis of childcare and women's fertility decisions in Western Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family 65: 584–596.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J.T., and Rapson, R.L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge Press.
Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L., and Feldhaus, M. (2011). Panel analysis of intimate relationships and family dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 23: 77–101.
Kalmijn, M. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life-course: an analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks 25: 231–249.
Keim, S. (2011). Social networks and family formation processes. Young adults' decision making about parenthood. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
Keim, S., Klärner, A., and Bernardi, L. (2009). Qualifiying social influence on fertility intentions: Composition, structure and meaning of fertility-relevant social networks in Western Germany. Current Sociology 57: 888–907.
Kohler, H.-P. (2001). Fertility and social interactions: An economic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kohler, H.-P., Behrmann, J.R., and Watkins, S.C. (2001). The density of social networks and fertility decisions: Evidence from South Nyanza District, Kenia. Demography 38: 43–58.
Kohler, H.-P., Billari, F.C., and Ortega, J. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review 28: 641–680.
Kohler, H.-P. and Bühler, C. (2001). Social networks and fertility. In: Smelser, N.J. and Baltes, P.B. (eds.). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon/Elsevier Sciences: 14380–14384.
Kotte, M. and Ludwig, V. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behavior in Germany. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 207–226.
Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22: 28–51.
Lois, D. and Arránz Becker, O. (2014). Is childbearing contagious? Using panel data to disentangle mechanisms of social network influences on fertility decisions. Advances in life course research 21: 123–134.
Lyngstad, T.H. and Prskawetz, A. (2010). Do siblings’ fertility decisions influence each other? Demography 47: 923–934.
Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square test with one degree of freedom, extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58: 690–700.
Marsden, P.V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review 52: 122–131.
Marsden, P.V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology 16: 435–463.
McAllister, L. and Fischer, C.S. (1978). A procedure for surveying personal networks. Sociological Methods and Research 7: 131–148.
Milardo, R.M. (1982). Friendship networks in developing relationships: Converging and diverging social environments. Social Psychology Quarterly 45: 162–172.
Montgomery, M.R. and Casterline, J.B. (1996). Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility. Population and Development Review 22: 151–175.
Montgomery, M.R. and Casterline, J.B. (1993). The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: Evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models. Population Studies 47: 457–479.
Müller, B. and Castiglioni, L. (2015). Attrition im Beziehungs- und Familienpanel pairfam. In: Schupp, J. and Wolf, Christof (eds.). Nonresponse Bias: Qualitätssicherung sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS: 283–308.
Murphy, M. (2013). The intergenerational transmission of reproductive behaviour: Comparative perspectives. The History of the Family 18: 107–115.
Murphy, M. and Knudsen, L.B. (2002). The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: The effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female. Population Studies 56: 235–248.
Nauck, B., Brüderl, J., Huinink, J., and Walper, S. (2012). The German family panel (pairfam) (ZA5678 data file version 3.1.0). Cologne: GESIS Data Archiv.
Neugarten, B.L. (1979). Time, age and the life cycle. American Journal of Psychiatry 136: 887–894.
Philipov, D. and Kohler, H.-P. (2001). Tempo effects in the fertility decline in Eastern Europe: Evidence from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Russia. European Journal of Population 17: 37–60.
Pink, S., Leopold, T., and Engelhardt, H. (2014). Fertility and social interaction at the workplace: Does childbearing spread among colleagues? Advances in Life Course Research 21: 113–122.
Richter, N., Lois, D., Arránz Becker, O., and Kopp, J. (2012). Mechanismen des Netzwerkeinflusses auf Fertilitätsentscheidungen in Ost- und Westdeutschland. In: Huinink, J., Kreyenfeld, M., and Trappe, H. (eds.). Familie und Partnerschaft in Ost- und Westdeutschland: Ähnlich und doch immer noch anders? Sonderheft 9 der Zeitschrift für Familienforschung. Opaden: Barbara Budrich: 95–118.
Rindfuss, R.R., Kim Choe, M., Bumpass, L.L., and Tsuya, N.O. (2004). Social networks and family change in Japan. American Sociological Review 69: 838–861.
Sear, R., Gibson, M., A., Mace, R., and Colleran, H. (2009). Kin influence on the decision to start using modern contraception: A longitudinal study from rural Gambia. American Journal of Human Biology 21: 472–477.
Singer, J.D. and Willett, J.B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: University Press.
Steglich, C., Snijders, T.A.B., and Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology 40: 329–393.
Udry, J.R. (1982). The effect of normative pressure on fertility. Population and Environment 5: 109–122.
Wellman, B. (1979). The community question: the intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology 84: 1201–1231.
Wolf, C. (2010). Egozentrierte Netzwerke: Datenerhebung und Datenanalyse. In: Stegbauer, C. and Häußling, R. (eds.). Handbuch Netzwerkforschung. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag: 471–484.