Volume 34 - Article 18 | Pages 499–524
Generations and Gender Programme Wave 1 data collection: An overview and assessment of sampling and fieldwork methods, weighting procedures, and cross-sectional representativeness
By Tineke Fokkema, Andrej Kveder, Nicole Hiekel, Tom Emery, Aart C. Liefbroer
References
Biemer, P.B. and Christ, S.L. (2008). Weighting survey data. In: De Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J.J., and Dillman, D.A. (eds.). International Handbook of Survey Methodology. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 317–341.
De Luca, G. and Peracchi, F (2005). Survey participation in the first wave of SHARE. In: Börsch-Supan, A. and Jürges, H (eds.). The Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe - Methodology. Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA): 88–104.
EUROSTAT (2011). 2009 Comparative EU intermediate quality report - version 3 July 2011. Luxembourg: European Commission, EUROSTAT.
Groves, R.M. (1989). Survey Errors and Survey Costs. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley & Sons.
Groves, R.M. and Couper, M.P. (1998). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Harkness, J.A., Braun, M., Edwards, B., Johnson, T.P., Lyberg, L.E., Mohler, P.P., Pennell, B.E., and Smith, T.W. (2010). Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.
Hox, J., De Leeuw, E.D., and Boevé, A. (in preparation). Reliability and Cross-National Comparability of Multiple-Item Constructs.
Klausch, T., Hox, J.J., and Schouten, B. (2013). Measurement effects of survey mode on the equivalence of attitudinal rating scale questions. Sociological Methods & Research 42(3): 227–263.
Kveder, A. (2005). Definitions and documentation of the final disposition codes. In: Europe, United Nations Economic Commission for (ed.). Generations & Gender Programme. Survey Instruments. New York and Geneva: United Nations: 115–118.
Kveder, A. (2007). Guidelines for survey fieldwork and panel maintenance. In: Europe, United Nations Economic Commission for (ed.). Generations & Gender Programme. Concepts and Guidelines. New York and Geneva: United Nations: 45–58.
Lynn, P., Beerten, R., Laiho, J., and Martin, J. (2001). Recommended standard final outcome categories and standard definitions of response rate for social surveys. ISER Working Papers.
Pennell, B.-E., Harkness, J.A., Levenstein, R., and Quaglia, M. (2010). Challenges in cross-national data collection. In: Harkness, J.A., Braun, M., Edwards, B., Johnson, T.P., Lyberg, L.E., Mohler, P.P., Pennell, B.-E., and Smith, T.W (eds.). Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley: 269–298.
Research, American Association for Public Opinion (2011). Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 7th edition. AAPOR.
Schouten, B., Van den Brakel, J., Buelens, B., Van der Laan, J., and Klausch, T. (2013). Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys. Social Science Research 42: 1555–1570.
Simard, M. and Franklin, S. (2005). Sample design guidelines. In: Europe, United Nations Economic Commission for (ed.). Generations & Gender Programme. Survey Instruments. New York and Geneva: United Nations: 3–14.
Singer, E. and Ye, C. (2013). The use and effects of incentives in surveys. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645(1): 112–141.
Singer, E., Van Hoewyk, J., Gebler, N., Raghunathan, T., and McGonagle, K. (1999). The effect of incentives on response rates in interviewer-mediated surveys. Journal of Official Statistics 15(2): 217–230.
Vergauwen, J., Wood, J., De Wachter, D., and Neels, K. (2015). Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1. Demographic Research 32(24): 723–774.