Volume 29 - Article 46 | Pages 1299–1330  

Nonresident Fathers and Formal Child Support: Evidence from the CPS, NSFG, and SIPP

By J. Bart Stykes, Wendy Manning, Susan L. Brown

Abstract

Background: Since the beginning of the 1980s, researchers have been raising concerns that surveys underestimated nonresident fatherhood due to sampling and questionnaire effects. Consequently, federal data collection efforts focused resources on reports from custodial mothers rather than from nonresident fathers. Recent data from three national sources provide researchers with an opportunity to estimate the prevalence of nonresident fathers.

Objective: Our goals were to provide estimates of contemporary nonresident fatherhood and of formal child support payments in the U.S., and to examine the consistency of these estimates across surveys.

Methods: We presented descriptive results for the proportion of men (aged 15-44) who reported having a nonresident child, and the proportion of nonresident fathers who reported having provided some formal support in the last year, using three nationally representative surveys: the Current Population Survey (CPS), the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), and the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG).

Results: The NSFG produced higher estimates of nonresident fatherhood, whereas both the CPS and the SIPP produced lower estimates of nonresident fatherhood. The findings on the composition of the nonresident father population by race/ethnicity and educational attainment also differed across the surveys. The results further demonstrated that the nonresident fathers identified in the NSFG were less likely to have been providing formal support, and that the racial/ethnic and educational differences found in the provision of formal support varied across the surveys.

Conclusions: Three nationally representative U.S. surveys produced substantively different estimates of the nonresident father population, and of the extent to which these fathers were providing formal child support. Ultimately, this study illustrates that we lack robust estimates of nonresident fatherhood in the U.S.

Author's Affiliation

• J. Bart Stykes - Sam Houston State University, United States of America EMAIL
• Wendy Manning - Bowling Green State University, United States of America EMAIL
• Susan L. Brown - Bowling Green State University, United States of America EMAIL

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

Predictive utility of key family planning indicators on dynamic contraceptive outcomes: Results from longitudinal surveys in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Uganda, and Côte d'Ivoire
Volume 50 - Article 45    | Keywords: contraception, contraceptive adoption, contraceptive discontinuation, contraceptive use, family planning, longitudinal data, methods, panel data, Performance and Monitoring for Action (PMA) surveys, sub-Saharan Africa

Classifying multiple ethnic identifications: Methodological effects on child, adolescent, and adult ethnic distributions
Volume 44 - Article 21    | Keywords: ethnic classification, ethnic measurement, ethnicity, methods, multiple ethnicities, race/ethnicity

Fathers' involvement with their children in the United Kingdom: Recent trends and class differences
Volume 40 - Article 30    | Keywords: child support, fatherhood, inequality, time use

Non-resident parent-child contact after marital dissolution and parental repartnering: Evidence from Italy
Volume 33 - Article 40    | Keywords: gender differences, nonresident fathers, nonresident mothers, nonresident parent-child contact, parents’ repartnering

All tied up: Tied staying and tied migration within the United States, 1997 to 2007
Volume 29 - Article 30    | Keywords: family, family migration, internal migration, methods, migration, tied migration, tied staying