Volume 29 - Article 24 | Pages 641–662
Modeling reproductive decisions with simple heuristics
By Peter Todd, Thomas Hills, Andrew Hendrickson
References
Beckage, N., Todd, P.M., Penke, L., and Asendorpf, J.B. (2009). Testing sequential patterns in human mate choice using speed dating. In: Taatgen, N. and van Rijn, H. (eds.). Proceedings of the 2009 Cognitive Science Conference. : 2365-2370.
Becker, G.S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Christakis, N.A. and Fowler, J.H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Coale, A.J. (1971). Age patterns of marriage. Population Studies 25(2): 193–214.
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1987). From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In: Dupré, J. (ed.). The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books: 277-306.
Davis, J.N. and Todd, P.M. (1999). Parental investment by simple decision rules. In: Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., and Group, the ABC Research (eds.). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press: 309-324.
Dugatkin, L.A. (2000). The imitation factor: Evolution beyond the gene. New York: Free Press.
Faurie, C., Russell, A.F., and Lummaa, V. (2009). Middleborns disadvantaged? Testing birth-order effects on fitness in pre-industrial Finns. PLoS ONE 4(5): e5680.
Finkel, E.J. and Eastwick, P.W. (2008). Speed-dating. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(3): 193-197.
Fortenberry, J.D., Tu, W., Harezlak, J., Katz, B.P., and Orr, D.P. (2002). Condom use as a function of time in new and established adolescent sexual relationships. American Journal of Public Health 92(2): 211-213.
Gigerenzer, G. and Goldstein, D.G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 103: 650–669.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., and Group, the ABC Research (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, D.G. and Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review 109: 75-90.
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Juette, A., Ronzal, G., and Thornhill, R. (2001). Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In: Rhodes, G. and Zebrobwitz, L. (eds.). Advances in visual cognition: Vol. I: Facial attractiveness. Westport, CT: Ablex: 91–125.
Haselton, M.G. and Gangestad, S.W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior 49(4): 509-518.
Hertwig, R., Davis, J.N., and Sulloway, F.J. (2002). Parental investment: How an equity motive can produce inequality. Psychological Bulletin 128: 728–745.
Hills, T.T. and Todd, P.M. (2008). Population heterogeneity and individual differences in an assortative agent-based marriage and divorce model (MADAM) using search with relaxing expectations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11(4): 5.
Hills, T.T., Todd, P.M., and Goldstone, R.L. (2008). Search in external and internal spaces: Evidence for generalized cognitive search processes. Psychological Science 19(8): 802-808.
Kalick, S.M. and Hamilton, T.E. (1986). The matching hypothesis reexamined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 673–682.
Kavanagh, P.S., Robins, S., and Ellis, B.J. (2010). The mating sociometer: A regulatory mechanism for mating aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99(1): 120-132.
Kenrick, D.T., Groth, G.E., Trost, M.R., and Sadalla, E.K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 951-969.
Kirkpatrick, L.A. and Ellis, B.J. (2001). An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In: Fletcher, G. and Clark, M. (eds.). The Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2: Interpersonal processes. Oxford, England: Blackwell: 411-436.
Kurzban, R. and Weeden, J. (2005). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior 26(3): 227-244.
Lenton, A.P. and Francesconi, M. (2010). How humans cognitively manage an abundance of mate options. Psychological Science 21(4): 528-533.
Li, N.P., Bailey, J.M., Kenrick, D.T., and Linsenmeier, J.A.W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 947-955.
Miller, G.F. and Todd, P.M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(5): 190-198.
Place, S.S., Todd, P.M., Penke, L., and Asendorpf, J.B. (2010). Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices. Evolution and Human Behavior 31(5): 320-325.
Puts, D.A., Welling, L.L.M., Burriss, R.P., and Dawood, K. (2012). Men's masculinity and attractiveness predict their female partners' reported orgasm frequency and timing. Evolution & Human Behavior 33(1): 1-9.
Saad, G., Eba, A., and Sejean, R. (2009). Sex differences when searching for a mate: A process-tracing approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 22(2): 171-190.
Simão, J. and Todd, P.M. (2003). Emergent patterns of mate choice in human populations. Artificial Life 9(4): 403-417.
Simon, H.A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 41: 1-20.
Tanner, A.E., Hensel, D.J., and Fortenberry, J.D. (2010). A prospective study of the sexual, emotional, and behavioral correlates associated with young women's first and usual coital events. The Journal of Adolescent Health 47(1): 20-25.
Todd, P.M. (2007). Coevolved cognitive mechanisms in mate search: Making decisions in a decision-shaped world. In: Forgas, J.P., Haselton, M.G., and von Hippel, W. (eds.). Evolution and the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology series). New York: Psychology Press: 145-159.
Todd, P.M., Billari, F.C., and Simão, J. (2005). Aggregate age-at-marriage patterns from individual mate-search heuristics. Demography 42(3): 559-574.
Todd, P.M. and Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Environments that make us smart: Ecological rationality. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(3): 167-171.
Todd, P.M., Gigerenzer, G., and Group, the ABC Research (2012). Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Todd, P.M. and Miller, G.F. (1999). From pride and prejudice to persuasion: Satisficing in mate search. In: Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., and Group, the ABC Research (eds.). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press: 287-308.
Todd, P.M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., and Lenton, A.P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104(38): 15011-15016.
Todd, P.M., Place, S.S., and Bowers, R.I. (2012). Simple heuristics for mate choice decisions. In: Krueger, J.I. (ed.). Social judgment and decision making. New York: Psychology Press: 193-208.
Tu, W., Batteiger, B.E., Wiehe, S., Ofner, S., Van Der Pol, B., Katz, B.P., Orr, D.P., and Fortenberry, J.D. (2009). Time from first intercourse to first sexually transmitted infection diagnosis among adolescent women. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 163(12): 1106-1111.
Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans. Human Nature 18(3): 264-271.