Volume 29 - Article 11 | Pages 275–306  

Love, marriage, then the baby carriage? Marriage timing and childbearing in Sweden

By Jennifer A. Holland

References

Andersson, G. (2004). Childbearing developments in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden from the 1970s to the 1990s: A comparison. Demographic Research, Special Collection 3(7): 155-176.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G. (2004). Demographic trends in Sweden: An update of childbearing and nuptiality up to 2002. Demographic Research, Special Collection 11(4): 95-110.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G. (1998). Trends in Marriage Formation in Sweden 1971–1993. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 14(2): 157-178.

Download reference:

Andersson, G. and Philipov, D. (2002). Life-table representations of family dynamics in Sweden, Hungary, and 14 other FFS countries: A project of descriptions of demographic behavior. Demographic Research, Special Collection 7(4): 67-144.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Axinn, W.G. and Thornton, A. (2000). The transformation in the meaning of marriage. In: Waite, L.J. (ed.). The Ties that Bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter: 147-165.

Download reference:

Baizán, P., A., Aassve., and Billari, F.C. (2004). The interrelations between cohabitation, marriage and first birth in Germany and Sweden. Population & Environment 25(6): 531-561.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1991). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Bennett, N.G., Bloom, D.E., and Miller, C.K. (1995). The influence of nonmarital childbearing on the formation of first marriages. Demography 32(1): 47-62.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berk, R.A., Western, D., and Weiss, R.E. (1995). Statistical inference for apparent populations. Sociological Methodology 25: 421-458.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernhardt, E. (2002). Cohabitation and marriage among young adults in Sweden: Attitudes, expectations and plans. Scandinavian Population Studies 13.

Download reference:

Bernhardt, E. (2004). Cohabitation or marriage? Preferred living arrangements in Sweden. Austrian Institute for Family Studies.

Download reference:

Berrington, A. (2001). Entry into parenthood and the outcome of cohabiting partnerships in Britain. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(1): 80-96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Björnberg, U. (2001). Cohabitation and marriage in Sweden ‐ Does family form matter? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(3): 350-362.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.-P. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affect the process of family formation. The American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143-168.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bøe, S. (2010). Sambos med Barn Bör Gifta Sig [Cohabitors with Children Should Marry]. Dagens Nyheter .

Brown, S.L. (2010). Marriage and child well-being: Research and policy perspectives. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(5): 1059-1077.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848-861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2009). The Marriage-Go-Round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Download reference:

Duvander, A.-Z.E. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage: A longitudinal Study of the propensity to marry in Sweden in the early 1990s. Journal of Family Issues 20(5): 698-717.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Edin, K. and Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Download reference:

Goldscheider, F.K. and Waite, L.J. (1986). Sex differences in the entry into marriage. The American Journal of Sociology 92(1): 91-109.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldstein, J.R. and Kenney, C.T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review 66(4): 506-519.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Harknett, K. and McLanahan, S.S. (2004). Racial and ethnic differences in marriage after the birth of a child. American Sociological Review 69(6): 790-811.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J.M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214-1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A.C., and Poortman, A.-R. (2012). The meaning of cohabitation across Europe. Paper presented at the European Population Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, June 13-16 2012.

Download reference:

Hobcraft, J. and Kiernan, K. (1995). Becoming a parent in Europe. In: Evolution or revolution in European population: Proceedings of the European Population Coverence. Milan: FrancoAngeli: 27-65.

Download reference:

Holland, J.A. and Thomson, E. (2011). Stepfamily childbearing in Sweden: Quantum and tempo effects, 1950–99. Population Studies 65(1): 115-128.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2007). Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990–2000. Population Studies 61(3): 243-263.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (Forthcoming). The educational gradient in marriage: A comparison of 25 European countries. Demography .

Download reference:

Kennedy, S. and Bumpass, L. (2008). Cohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research 19(47): 1663-1692.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(1): 1-21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kravdal, Ø. (1994). The importance of economic activity, economic potential and economic resources for the timing of first births in Norway. Population Studies 48(2): 249-267.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R.J. and Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review 14(1): 1-45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lichter, D.T. and Graefe, D.R. (2001). Finding a mate? The marital and cohabitation histories of unwed mothers. In: Wu, L.L. and Wolfe, B. (eds.). Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation: 317-343.

Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Smock, P.J. (1995). Why marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitors. Demography 32(4): 509-520.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Martin, S.P. (2004). Women’s education and family timing: Outcomes and trends associated with age at marriage and first birth. In: Neckerman, K.M. (ed.). Social inequality. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation: 79-118.

Download reference:

Ohlsson-Wijk, S. (2011). Sweden's marriage revival: An analysis of the new-millennium switch from long-term decline to increasing popularity. Population Studies 65(2): 183-200.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. The American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563-591.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1994). Women's rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review 20(2): 293-342.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., Sigle-Rushton, W., Keizer, R., Lappegård, T., Jasilioniene, A., Berghammer, C., and Di Giulio, P. (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in eleven European countries, 1970s to early 2000s. Population Studies 66(2): 1-16.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reinhold, S. (2010). Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability. Demography 47(3): 719-733.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rindfuss, R.R. and VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review 16(4): 703-726.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Roussel, L. (1989). La famille incertaine [The Uncertain Family]. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.

Download reference:

Sassler, S. and Miller, A.J. (2011). Class differences in cohabitation processes. Family Relations 60(2): 163-177.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schwartz, C.R. and Mare, R.D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography 42(4): 621-646.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85-138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Statistics Sweden (2002). Befolkningsstatistik, Del 4: Födda och döda, civilståndsändringar m. m., 2001 [Population Statistics, Part 4: Births and deaths, marital status changes, etc., 2001]. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.

Download reference:

Sweeney, M.M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review 67(1): 132-147.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thalberg, S. (2011). Does money matter? Childbearing behaviour of Swedish students in the 1980s and 1990s. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 2011: 5-20.

Download reference:

Thomson, E. and Eriksson, H. (Forthcoming). Register-based estimates of parental separation in Sweden. Demographic Research .

Download reference:

Thomson, E., Winkler-Dworak, M., and Kennedy, S. (2009). Education and the family life course. Stockholm Reserach Reports in Demography 2009(3).

Download reference:

Thornton, A., Axinn, W.G., and Xie, Y. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Bavel, J. (2010). Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: The impact of expected earnings, gender composition, and family attitudes. Demography 47(2): 439-458.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A., Bernhardt, E., and Noack, T. (2009). A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(3): 465-477.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A., Bernhardt, E., and Noack, T. (2010). Love or money? Marriage intentions among young cohabitors in Norway and Sweden. Acta Sociologica 53(3): 269-287.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ytterberg, H. and Waaldijk, K. (2005). Major legal consequences of marriage, cohabitation and registered partnership for different-sex and same-sex partners in Sweden. In: Waaldijk, K. (ed.). More or less together: Levels of legal consequences of marriage, cohabitation and registered partnership for different-sex and same-sex partners. Paris: Institut National d’Etudes Démographiques: 169-186.

Download reference:

Back to the article