Volume 25 - Article 3 | Pages 103–134
Sampling international migrants with origin-based snowballing method: New evidence on biases and limitations
By Cris Beauchemin, Amparo González-Ferrer
References
Arenas, E., Teruel, G.M., Rubalcaba, L., and Herrera, C. (2009). Tracking beyond borders: Experience of the Mexican Family Life Survey. Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, Detroit.
Bilsborrow, R.E. and CEPAR (Centro de Estudios sobre Población y Desarrollo Social) (2007). The Living Conditions of Refugees, Asylum-seekers and Other Colombians in Ecuador: Millennium Development Indicators and Coping Behaviour. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
Bilsborrow, R.E., Hugo, G., Oberai, A., and Zlotnik, H. (1997). International Migration Statistics: Guidelines for Improving Data Collection Systems. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Condé, J. and Diagne, P.S. (1986). Les migrations internationales Sud-Nord: une étude de cas: les migrants maliens, mauritaniens, sénégalais de la vallée du Fleuve Sénégal en France. Paris: OCDE.
Fawcett, J.T. and Arnold, F. (1987). The role of surveys in the study of international migration: An appraisal. International Migration Review 21(4): 1523-1540.
Friberg, J.H. (2010). Working Conditions for Polish Construction Workers and Domestic Cleaners in Oslo: Segmentation, Inclusion and the Role of Policy. In: Black, R., Engbersen, G., Okólski, M., and Pantîru, C. (eds.). A Continent Moving West? EU Enlargement and Labour Migration from Central and Eastern Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 23-50.
Grasmuck, S. and Pessar, P.R. (1991). Between two islands: Dominican international migration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Groenewold, G. and Bilsborrow, R.E. (2008). Design of samples for international migration surveys: Methodological considerations and lessons learned from a multi-country study in Africa and Europe. In: Bonifazi, C., Okólski, M., Schoorl, J., and Simon, P. (eds.). International migration in Europe; new trends and new methods of analysis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 293-312.
Heckathorn, D.D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems 44(2): 174-199.
Heckathorn, D.D. (2006). Studying second-generation immigrants: Methodological challenges and innovative solutions. (Migration Information Source).
Massey, D.S. (1987). The Ethnosurvey in theory and practice. International Migration Review 21(4): 1498-1522.
Massey, D.S. (1994). The Methodology of an Ethnosurvey. In: Bogue, D.J. (ed.). Readings in the Methodology of Population Research. New York: UNFPA.
Massey, D.S. and Zenteno, R. (2000). A validation of the Ethnosurvey: The case of Mexico-US Migration. International Migration Review 34(3): 766-793.
Mazzucato, V. (2008). Simultaneity and Networks in Transnational Migration: Lessons Learned from a Simultaneous-Matched Sample Methodology. In: DeWind, J. and Holdaway, J. (eds.). Migration and Development Within and Across Borders: Research and Policy Perspectives on Internal and International Migration. Geneva: International Organization for Migration: 69-100.
McKenzie, D.J. and Mistiaen, J. (2009). Surveying migrant households: A comparison of census-based, Snowball and Intercept Point Surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 172(2): 339-360.
Parrado, E.A., McQuiston, C., and Flippen, C.A. (2005). Participatory Survey Research: Integrating community collaboration and quantitative methods for the study of gender and HIV risks among Hispanic migrants. Sociological Methods and Research 34(2): 204-239.
Rallu, J.L. (2008). One-way or both-ways migration surveys. In: Bonifazi, C., Okolski, M., Schoorl, J., and Simon, P. (eds.). International migration in Europe: New trends and new methods of analysis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 273-292.
Stillman, S., McKenzie, D.J., and Gibson, J. (2007). Migration and mental health: Evidence from a natural experiment. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (nº 4138).