Volume 21 - Article 7 | Pages 177–214  

"Living Apart Together" relationships in the United States

By Charles Strohm, Judith Seltzer, Susan Cochran, Vickie Mays

Abstract

We use two surveys to describe the demographic and attitudinal correlates of being in “Living Apart Together” (LAT), cohabiting, and marital relationships for heterosexuals, lesbians, and gay men. About one third of U.S. adults not married or cohabiting are in LAT relationships – these individuals would be classified as “single” in conventional studies that focus on residential unions. Gay men are somewhat more likely than heterosexual men to be in LAT relationships. For heterosexuals and lesbians, LAT relationships are more common among younger people. Heterosexuals in LAT unions are less likely to expect to marry their partners, but more likely to say that couples should be emotionally dependent than are cohabiters. Regardless of sexual orientation, people in LAT relationships perceive similar amounts of emotional support from partners, but less instrumental support than cohabiters perceive.

Author's Affiliation

• Charles Strohm - University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America EMAIL
• Judith Seltzer - University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America EMAIL
• Susan Cochran - University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America EMAIL
• Vickie Mays - University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America EMAIL

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe
Volume 32 - Article 8

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

The changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics and fertility trends in Europe and the United States: A review
Volume 52 - Article 7    | Keywords: childbearing, Europe, family complexity, fertility, fertility, marriage, partnership, United States of America

Unmarried motherhood and infant health: The role of intimate partner violence in Colombia
Volume 52 - Article 6    | Keywords: cohabitation, Colombia, infant health, intimate partner violence, low birthweight, partnership status

Studying individuals in same-sex couples using longitudinal administrative data from Canadian tax records: Opportunities and challenges
Volume 52 - Article 2    | Keywords: administrative data, Canada, Longitudinal Administrative Databank, same-sex couples, sexual orientation, sexual orientation earnings gap, tax data

Left behind single in the partnering market? Entry into cohabiting unions by women and men with low educational attainment across regions of Europe, cohorts 1960 to 1985
Volume 51 - Article 43    | Keywords: cohabitation, education, Europe, European Social Survey, event history analysis, logistic regression, marginalization, partner selection, singlehood, union formation

Between money and intimacy: Brideprice, marriage, and women’s position in contemporary China
Volume 50 - Article 46    | Keywords: brideprice, China, divorce, family, family law, gender inequalities, marriage