Volume 14 - Article 17 | Pages 405–428
Changes in educational assortative mating in contemporary Spain
By Albert Esteve, Clara Cortina
References
Becker, G. (1981). A Treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Birkelund, G.E. and Heldald, J. (2003). Who Marries whom? Educational Homogamy in Norway. Demographic Research 8(1): 1-30.
Blackwell, D.L. (1998). Marital homogamy in the United States: The influence of individual and parental education. Social Science Research 27(2): 159-188.
Blossfeld, H.-P. and Timm, A. (eds.) (2003). Who marries whom? Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies. Vol. 12. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cabré, A. (1993). Volverán tórtolos y cigüeñas. In: Garrido, L. and Gil Calvo, E. (eds.). Estrategias familiares. Madrid: Alianza Editorial: 113-131.
Carabaña, J. (1994). La constante homogamia educativa. Economia y Sociedad 11: 43-66.
Cortina, C. (2004). Nivell educatiu, origen geogràfic i nacionalitat en la composició de la les parelles a Espanya. Una aproximació a l’estudi de l’homogàmia i l’endogàmia. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Geografia, Mimeo.
Esteve, A. (2005). Tendencias en homogamia educacional en México: 1970-2000. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos 59/20(2).
Esteve, A. and McCaa, R. (2005). Homogamia Educacional en México y Brasil, 1970-2000: Pautas y Tendencias. Paper presented at the XXV International Population Conference. IUSSP, Tours.
Forsé, M. and Chauvel, L. (1995). L'évolution de l'homogamie en France. Revue française de sociologie XXXVI: 123-142.
González, M.J. (2001). The Interplay between Ocupational Career and Family Formation in Spain. [PhD Dissertation]. European University Institute: Social and Political Sciences Department.
González, M.J. (2003). Who Marries Whom in Spain? In: Blossfeld, H.-P. and Timm, A. (eds.). Who Marries Whom? Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies. Vol. 12. Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 57-78.
Halpin, B. and Chan, T.W. (2003). Educational homogamy in Ireland and Britain: trends and patterns. British Journal of Sociology 54(4): 473-495.
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395-421.
Kalmijn, M. (1991). Status Homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 97(2): 496-523.
Katrnák, T. (2005). Educational Assortative Mating in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary between 1976 and 2003. Mimeo.
Knoke, D. and Burke, P. (1980). Log Linear Models. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Mare, R.D. (1991). Five decades of assortative mating. American Sociological Review 56(1): 15-32.
McCaa, R. (1993). Ethnic intermarriage and gender in New York City. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 24(2): 207-231.
Oppenheimer, V.K. (1988). A Theory of Marriage Timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563-591.
Oppenheimer, V.K. (1994). Women’s Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial Societies. Population and Development Review 20(2): 293-342.
Pagnini, D.L. and Morgan, S.P. (1990). Intermarriage and social distance among U.S. immigrants at the turn of the century. American Sociological Review 96(2): 405-432.
Park, H. (2001). Educational Homogamy in East Asian Countries: Patterns and Trends. Berkeley, International Sociological Association Meeting (Mimeo).
Pérez, J. (2001). Transformaciones demográficas en los recorridos hacia la madurez. [PhD Dissertion]. Universidad Nacional a Distancia (UNED), Departamento de Sociología II.
Qian, Z. (1998). Changes in Assortative Mating. The Impact of Age and Education, 1970, 1990. Demography 35(3): 279-292.
Schwartz, C. and Mare, R.D. (2004). How do Marriage, Divorce, and Educational Upgrading Affect Trends in Educational Assortative Mating? Paper presented at the Population Association of America Conference, Boston.
Schwartz, C. and Mare, R.D. (2005). Trends in Educational Assortative Marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography 42(4): 621-646.
Smits, J., Ultee, W., and Lammers, J. (1998). Educational homogamy in 65 countries: an explanation of differences in openness using country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review 63(2): 264-285.