TY  - JOUR
A1  - Heckert, Jessica
T1  - New perspective on youth migration: Motives and family investment patterns
Y1  - 2015/10/14
JF  - Demographic Research
JO  - Demographic Research
SN  - 1435-9871
SP  - 765
EP  - 800
DO  - 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.27
VL  - 33
IS  - 27
UR  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol33/27/
L1  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol33/27/33-27.pdf
L2  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol33/27/33-27.pdf
L3  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol33/27/files/readme.33-27.txt
L3  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol33/27/files/demographic-research.31-27.zip
N2  - Background: Migration research commonly assumes that youth migrate as dependent family members or are motivated by current labor opportunities and immediate financial returns. These perspectives ignore how migration experiences, specifically motives and remittance behaviors, are unique to youth. 

Objective: This study investigates internal migration among the Haitian youth, aged 10-24. The study compares characteristics of youth who migrate with education and labor motives and determines characteristics associated with family financial support to youth migrants. 

Methods: The data are from the 2009 Haiti Youth Survey. Discrete-time event history analysis is used to model characteristics associated with education and labor migration. A two-stage Heckman probit model is used to determine characteristics associated with family financial support for two different samples of youth migrants. 

Results: Both education and labor migration become more common with increasing age. Education migration is more common among youth born outside the capital and those first enrolled in school on time. Labor migration differs little by region of birth, and is associated with late school enrollment. Moreover, rather than sending remittances home, many youth migrants continue to receive financial support from their parents. Provision of financial support to youth migrants is associated with current school enrollment. Female youth are more likely to be migrants, and less commonly receive support from their household of origin. 

Conclusions: Results illustrate that youth migration motives and remittance behaviors differ from those of adults, and many households of origin continue to invest in the human capital of youth migrants. Education migration may diversify household risk over an extended time horizon. 

Contribution: * 

ER  -