Volume 35 - Article 45 | Pages 1317-1342

The diffusion of cohabitation and children’s risks of family dissolution in Canada

By David Pelletier

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:22 Oct 2015
Date published:18 Nov 2016
Word count:6605
Keywords:Canada, children, cohabitation, context, diffusion of cohabitation, marriage, Quebec, union instability
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.45
 

Abstract

Background: Because cohabiting unions are, on average, less stable than marriages, the diffusion of childbearing within cohabitation could lead to an overall increase in family instability. The possibility that cohabiting families become increasingly stable throughout the diffusion process is, however, seldom studied.

Objective: Taking the point of view of Canadian children, we investigated the differential effect of the diffusion of childbearing within cohabitation on married and cohabiting parents’ risks of separation. We were especially attentive to the functional form of relationships and to the specific role of selection and causal mechanisms.

Methods: We used Cox regressions to estimate children’s hazards of parental separation up to age 6 according to the prevalence of childbearing within cohabitation in their province and cohort. The analysis is conducted by merging individual survey data on Canadian children born from 1989 to 2004 (NLSCY; n=24,175) with contextual data from various sources.

Results: As childbearing within cohabitation increased in Canadian provinces, cohabiting families remained less stable than married ones, but the stability levels of both converged. The stability gap was only partially explained by the selection of more separation-prone parents into cohabitation; the remaining gap could be associated with the normative context in which family formation occurs.

Contribution: Comparing several geographic units and cohorts within the same model allowed us to describe the association between the diffusion process and separation using continuous functions, not only for the hazard ratio but also for its numerator (decreasing separation risks among cohabiting families) and denominator (increasing risks among married families).

Author's Affiliation

David Pelletier - Université de Montréal, Canada [Email]

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Impact of conjugal separation on women’s income in Canada: Does the type of union matter?
Volume 35 - Article 50    | Keywords: Canada, cohabitation, marriage

» A gender perspective on preferences for marriage among cohabitating couples
Volume 15 - Article 10    | Keywords: children, cohabitation, marriage

» From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness
Volume 36 - Article 55    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

» On the normative foundations of marriage and cohabitation: Results from group discussions in eastern and western Germany
Volume 36 - Article 53    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

» Continuity and change of cohabitation in Mexico: Same as before or different anew
Volume 35 - Article 42    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

Articles

»Volume 35

 

Citations

 

 

Similar Articles

 

 

Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID