Volume 33 - Article 22 | Pages 611-652 Editor's Choice

Does waiting pay off for couples? Partnership duration prior to household formation and union stability

By Christine Schnor

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:30 Oct 2013
Date published:18 Sep 2015
Word count:9602
Keywords:cohabitation, German Family Panel, household formation, living apart together (LAT), marriage, non-residential partnership, separation, union stability
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.22
Updated Items:On September 25, 2015 changes were made to Figure 1 on pages 630 and 631.
 

Abstract

Background: Most couples that live together began their relationship while having separate addresses. In contrast to the large body of literature on the role of pre-marital cohabitation in divorce, very little is known about how the partnership period before moving in together affects union stability.

Objective: This article investigates: 1) the timing of household formation in a couple’s history, 2) the impact of such timing on dissolution behavior, and 3) how household formation and dissolution differ for first and higher-order partnerships.

Methods: Using data based on 15,081 partnerships (of which 45% were coresidential unions) from the German Family Panel, cumulative incidence curves reveal the dynamic of the non-coresidential partnership episode. For the sample of coresidential unions (N=6,741), piecewise constant survival models with a person-specific frailty term are estimated in order to assess the influence of household formation timing on union stability.

Results: Partnership arrangements with partners living in separate households are transitory in nature and may result in either household formation or separation. First partnerships transform into coresidential unions less often and later than higher-order partnerships. Union stability is positively related to the duration of the preceding non-coresidential period. Especially among unions with a non-coresidential period of 7 to 24 months, first partnerships have lower dissolution risks than higher-order partnerships.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the non-coresidential period is a significant phase in the partnership, as it enables couples to acquire information about the quality of their partnership.

Author's Affiliation

Christine Schnor - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium [Email]

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» "Living Apart Together" relationships in the United States
Volume 21 - Article 7    | Keywords: cohabitation, living apart together (LAT), marriage, non-residential partnership

» Introduction to research on immigrant and ethnic minority families in Europe
Volume 35 - Article 2    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, separation

» Partnership formation and dissolution among immigrants in the Spanish context
Volume 35 - Article 1    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, separation

» Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom
Volume 33 - Article 10    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, separation

» Do co-residence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries
Volume 31 - Article 3    | Keywords: cohabitation, living apart together (LAT), marriage

Articles

»Volume 33

 

Citations

 

 

Similar Articles

 

 

Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID