Volume 33 - Article 19 | Pages 535–560

Modeling the fertility impact of the proximate determinants: Time for a tune-up

By John Bongaarts

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:16 Dec 2014
Date published:11 Sep 2015
Word count:4610
Keywords:fertility, model, proximate determinants
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.19
 

Abstract

Background: Many analyses of the determinants of fertility make a distinction between proximate and background determinants. The former include behavioral factors such as the use of contraception or abortion through which the background determinants (e.g., social and economic variables) affect fertility. These relationships were first recognized by Davis and Blake (1956), who defined a large set of “intermediate fertility variables.” In the late 1970s Bongaarts (1978) identified a smaller set of proximate determinants and developed a relatively simple model to quantify their fertility effects.

Objective: This paper fine-tunes the Bongaarts proximate determinants model in light of new evidence, research, and data that have become available over the past three decades. Reproductive behavior has changed substantially and certain original simplifying assumptions have become less accurate over time. In addition, new research allows some features of the model to be improved.

Methods: Six adjustments to the model are proposed and implemented. The revised model is compared with the original version and with a revision proposed by Stover (1998).

Results: Revised estimates of the indexes of the proximate determinants and total fecundity are provided for the most recent DHS surveys in 36 developing countries. The revised model provides a better fit than do earlier models.

Conclusions: The proximate determinants model, as originally conceived, remains conceptually sound. However, theoretical and empirical evidence accumulated over the past three decades suggests a number of ways to fine-tune the model to make it more robust and accurate in contemporary populations. The resulting revised model provides an improved assessment of the roles of the proximate determinants in national and sub-national populations.

Author's Affiliation

John Bongaarts - Population Council, International [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» The effect of contraception on fertility: Is sub-Saharan Africa different?
Volume 37 - Article 6

» Five period measures of longevity
Volume 13 - Article 21

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Effects of current education on second- and third-birth rates among Norwegian women and men born in 1964: Substantive interpretations and methodological issues
Volume 17 - Article 9    | Keywords: fertility, model

» The proximate determinants of fertility and birth intervals in Egypt: An application of calendar data
Volume 16 - Article 3    | Keywords: fertility, proximate determinants

» Does socioeconomic status matter? The fertility transition in a northern Italian village (marriage cohorts 1900‒1940)
Volume 37 - Article 15    | Keywords: fertility

» Supportive families versus support from families: The decision to have a child in the Netherlands
Volume 37 - Article 14    | Keywords: fertility

» Childlessness and fertility by couples' educational gender (in)equality in Austria, Bulgaria, and France
Volume 37 - Article 12    | Keywords: fertility

Articles

»Volume 33

 

Citations

 

 

Similar Articles

 

 

Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID