Volume 32 - Article 9 | Pages 287-310

The link between parenthood and partnership in contemporary Norway - Findings from focus group research

By Trude Lappegård, Turid Noack

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:14 Mar 2014
Date published:03 Feb 2015
Word count:7915
Keywords:cohabitation, focus groups, marriage, Norway, parenthood
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.9
Weblink:You will find all publications in this Special Collection “Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia” at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/17/
 

Abstract

Background: The increase in childbearing within cohabitation raises a question about the link between parenthood and partnership. In Norway, having the first child in cohabitation has become the most common pattern.

Objective: The paper studies the interrelated meaning of partnership, marriage, and childbearing. We ask what children mean to partnerships, what the meaning of marriage is for childbearing, and what reasons there are for marrying besides childbearing.

Methods: The data consist of eight focus group interviews on marriage and cohabitation. Each group had between five and nine participants aged 25 to 40 years, and was stratified by gender and education. All participants were Norwegian citizens living in Oslo. Both authors reviewed and discussed the central thematic categories relevant to the research question.

Results: When people feel free to choose between cohabitation and marriage, the role of parenthood becomes more salient for forming a union. We find that the meaning of partnership has shifted from being defined around marriage to being defined around having a child, which makes the link between partnership and childbearing more interesting. Discussing whether to have children or a pregnancy can bring up the question of marriage and make it more relevant. The conclusion, however, is not that marriage is normative when parenthood occurs. Although the focus groups participants did not feel any pressure to have children in marriage, the general opinion was that childbearing and marriage were linked. Opinions differed, however, about the nature of such a link.

Author's Affiliation

Trude Lappegård - Statistisk sentralbyrå (Statistics Norway), Norway [Email]
Turid Noack - Statistisk sentralbyrå (Statistics Norway), Norway [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34

» Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries
Volume 20 - Article 14

» New fertility trends in Norway
Volume 2 - Article 3

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» On the normative foundations of marriage and cohabitation: Results from group discussions in eastern and western Germany
Volume 36 - Article 53    | Keywords: cohabitation, focus groups, marriage

» The low importance of marriage in eastern Germany - social norms and the role of peoples’ perceptions of the past
Volume 33 - Article 9    | Keywords: cohabitation, focus groups, marriage

» Unemployment and the timing of parenthood: Implications of partnership status and partner’s employment
Volume 32 - Article 7    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, parenthood

» Impact of conjugal separation on women’s income in Canada: Does the type of union matter?
Volume 35 - Article 50    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

» The diffusion of cohabitation and children’s risks of family dissolution in Canada
Volume 35 - Article 45    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage