Volume 32 - Article 32 | Pages 873-914

Traditional and modern cohabitation in Latin America: A comparative typology

By Maira Covre-Sussai, Bart Meuleman, Sarah Botterman, Koen Matthijs

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:13 Jan 2014
Date published:08 May 2015
Word count:7793
Keywords:cohabitation, Demographic and Health Survey, Latin America, Multiple Group Latent Class Analysis (MGLCA)
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.32
 

Abstract

Background: The existence of cohabitation is a historical feature of nuptiality in Latin America. Traditionally, cohabitation was common in less developed regions, among the lower social classes. But today its occurrence is increasing and in social groups and regions in which it was not common. The features of this latter type of cohabitation remain unclear.

Objective: We differentiate types of cohabitation in Latin America on the basis of relationship context at its outset and its outcomes in terms of childbearing. The comparability of these types over countries is attested, as well as their evolution over time and the educational and age profiles of cohabitants.

Methods: Demographic and Health Survey data for the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s for up to eight countries are analyzed by means of Multiple Group Latent Class Analysis.

Results: Three types of cohabitation are found. The traditional type includes young and lower-educated women who start to cohabit during adolescence. They have more children at younger ages. The remaining two types of cohabitation included higher-educated women and are considered modern. The innovative type groups women from all age groups, with fewer children born at a higher age and never as a single woman. Blended cohabitation refers to older women, who could negotiate a marriage, but do not. They start to cohabit during adulthood, but always after single pregnancy.

Conclusions: The persistence of historical trends is attested. Traditional cohabitation is related to socioeconomic deprivation and prevails in Central American and Caribbean countries. However, two modern types of cohabitation are emerging in the region. They are concentrated in the South and related to women’s independence.

Author's Affiliation

Maira Covre-Sussai - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Brazil [Email]
Bart Meuleman - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium [Email]
Sarah Botterman - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium [Email]
Koen Matthijs - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Post-divorce family trajectories of men and women in Flanders
Volume 32 - Article 31

» Rivalry, solidarity, and longevity among siblings: A life course approach to the impact of sibship composition and birth order on later life mortality risk, Antwerp (1846-1920)
Volume 31 - Article 38

» Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders
Volume 28 - Article 29

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Continuity and change of cohabitation in Mexico: Same as before or different anew
Volume 35 - Article 42    | Keywords: cohabitation, Latin America

» Towards a Geography of Unmarried Cohabitation in the Americas
Volume 30 - Article 59    | Keywords: cohabitation, Latin America

» Disentangling how educational expansion did not increase women's age at union formation in Latin America from 1970 to 2000
Volume 28 - Article 3    | Keywords: cohabitation, Latin America

» Measuring male fertility rates in developing countries with Demographic and Health Surveys: An assessment of three methods
Volume 36 - Article 28    | Keywords: Demographic and Health Survey

» Impact of conjugal separation on women’s income in Canada: Does the type of union matter?
Volume 35 - Article 50    | Keywords: cohabitation