Volume 31 - Article 37 | Pages 1137–1166
Cohabitation and marriage in Austria: Assessing the individualization thesis across the life course
By Caroline Berghammer, Katrin Fliegenschnee, Eva-Maria Schmidt
This article is part of the Special Collection 17 „Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia“
Abstract
Background: Although cohabitation has spread rapidly in Austria during the past decades, it is more a prelude than an alternative to marriage. The individualization thesis serves as a conceptual framework for explaining the rise of cohabiting unions.
Objective: Our aim is to understand what motivates people to cohabit and marry from an individualization perspective. The present study was designed to investigate in which ways key notions of the individualization thesis such as commitment, romantic love and risk are reflected in discourses on cohabitation and marriage.
Methods: Research is based on data from eight focus group discussions (71 participants) conducted in Vienna, Austria, in 2012. This data was analyzed with the help of qualitative methods.
Results: The focus group participants regarded cohabitation and marriage as different life course strategies. They felt that young adulthood is a period characterized by uncertain external circumstances, in which people build up commitment in cohabitation without feeling limited in terms of opportunities. As dissolving a cohabiting union entails lower costs, the risk posed by this type of union was considered low. The respondents associated marriage with security and long-term commitment and saw it as an ideal for a later stage in life. They argued that romantic love and individual satisfaction should prevail throughout the entire marriage. Core terms of the individualization thesis - commitment, romantic love, and risk - were perceived differently between cohabitation and marriage. We conclude that the individualization thesis best fits young adulthood and is less relevant for later life stages.
Author’s Affiliation
- Caroline Berghammer - Universität Wien, Austria EMAIL
- Katrin Fliegenschnee - Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Austria EMAIL
- Eva-Maria Schmidt - Universität Wien, Austria EMAIL
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
Is single parenthood increasingly an experience of less-educated mothers? A European comparison over five decades
Volume 51 - Article 34
Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
The partnership context of first parenthood – and how it varies by parental class and birth cohort in the United Kingdom
Volume 53 - Article 16
| Keywords:
cohabitation,
cohort analysis,
event history,
event history analysis,
family formation,
intergenerational inequality,
marriage,
parental socio-economic status,
parenthood,
single parenthood,
United Kingdom
Gendered labor market adjustments around marital and cohabiting union transitions during Europe’s early cohabitation diffusion
Volume 53 - Article 15
| Keywords:
adult equivalent household income,
cohabitation,
employment income,
gender inequalities,
hours worked,
intra-household specialization,
marriage,
union transitions
Where do we go from here? Partnership-parenthood trajectories of cohabitation as first union during young adulthood in the United States
Volume 53 - Article 9
| Keywords:
cohabitation,
family inequality,
fertility,
marriage,
race/ethnicity,
transition to adulthood,
union formation,
United States of America
The changing inter-relationship between partnership dynamics and fertility trends in Europe and the United States: A review
Volume 52 - Article 7
| Keywords:
childbearing,
Europe,
family complexity,
fertility,
fertility,
marriage,
partnership,
United States of America
Unmarried motherhood and infant health: The role of intimate partner violence in Colombia
Volume 52 - Article 6
| Keywords:
cohabitation,
Colombia,
infant health,
intimate partner violence,
low birthweight,
partnership status
Cited References: 60
Download to Citation Manager
PubMed
Google Scholar