Volume 31 - Article 34 | Pages 1043-1078

Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia

By Brienna Perelli-Harris, Monika Mynarska, Ann Berrington, Caroline Berghammer, Ann Evans, Olga Isupova, Renske Keizer, Andreas Klärner, Trude Lappegård, Daniele Vignoli

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:27 Nov 2013
Date published:12 Nov 2014
Word count:10384
Keywords:cohabitation, Europe, family, marriage, partnership, relationships, unions
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.34
Weblink:You will find all publications in this Special Collection “Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia” at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/17/
 

Abstract

Background: Across the industrialized world, more couples are living together without marrying. Although researchers have compared cohabitation cross-nationally using quantitative data, few have compared union formation using qualitative data.

Objective: We use focus group research to compare social norms of cohabitation and marriage in Australia and nine countries in Europe. We explore questions such as: what is the meaning of cohabitation? To what extent is cohabitation indistinguishable from marriage, a prelude to marriage, or an alternative to being single? Are the meanings of cohabitation similar across countries?

Methods: Collaborators conducted seven to eight focus groups in each country using a standardized guideline. They analyzed the discussions with bottom-up coding in each thematic area. They then collated the data in a standardized report. The first and second authors systematically analyzed the reports, with direct input from collaborators.

Results: The results describe a specific picture of union formation in each country. However, three themes emerge in all focus groups: commitment, testing, and freedom. The pervasiveness of these concepts suggests that marriage and cohabitation have distinct meanings, with marriage representing a stronger level of commitment. Cohabitation is a way to test the relationship, and represents freedom. Nonetheless, other discourses emerged, suggesting that cohabitation has multiple meanings.

Conclusions: This study illuminates how context shapes partnership formation, but also presents underlying reasons for the development of cohabitation. We find that the increase in cohabitation has not devalued the concept of marriage, but has become a way to preserve marriage as an ideal for long-term commitment.

Author's Affiliation

Brienna Perelli-Harris - University of Southampton, United Kingdom [Email]
Monika Mynarska - Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie, Poland [Email]
Ann Berrington - University of Southampton, United Kingdom [Email]
Caroline Berghammer - Universität Wien, Austria [Email]
Ann Evans - Australian National University, Australia [Email]
Olga Isupova - National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE), Russian Federation [Email]
Renske Keizer - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Netherlands [Email]
Andreas Klärner - Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, Germany [Email]
Trude Lappegård - Statistisk sentralbyrå (Statistics Norway), Norway [Email]
Daniele Vignoli - Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» On the normative foundations of marriage and cohabitation: Results from group discussions in eastern and western Germany
Volume 36 - Article 53

» Uncertain lives: Insights into the role of job precariousness in union formation in Italy
Volume 35 - Article 10

» The fertility of recent migrants to England and Wales
Volume 34 - Article 36

» Educational differences in timing and quantum of childbearing in Britain: A study of cohorts born 1940−1969
Volume 33 - Article 26

» Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture: Introduction to Special Collection: "Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia"
Volume 33 - Article 25

» Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK
Volume 33 - Article 12

» The low importance of marriage in eastern Germany - social norms and the role of peoples’ perceptions of the past
Volume 33 - Article 9

» Changes in partnership patterns across the life course: An examination of 14 countries in Europe and the United States
Volume 33 - Article 6

» Educational differences in early childbearing: A cross-national comparative study
Volume 33 - Article 3

» Trust, responsibility, and freedom: Focus-group research on contemporary patterns of union formation in Russia
Volume 32 - Article 11

» Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment: Dutch focus group research on views on cohabitation and marriage
Volume 32 - Article 10

» The link between parenthood and partnership in contemporary Norway - Findings from focus group research
Volume 32 - Article 9

» Cohabitation and marriage in Austria: Assessing the individualization thesis across the life course
Volume 31 - Article 37

» Free to stay, free to leave: Insights from Poland into the meaning of cohabitation
Volume 31 - Article 36

» Religion and union formation in Italy: Catholic precepts, social pressure, and tradition
Volume 31 - Article 35

» Social networks and fertility
Volume 30 - Article 22

» Whose job instability affects the likelihood of becoming a parent in Italy? A tale of two partners
Volume 26 - Article 2

» The changing determinants of UK young adults' living arrangements
Volume 25 - Article 20

» Things change: Women’s and men’s marital disruption dynamics in Italy during a time of social transformations, 1970-2003
Volume 24 - Article 5

» Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries
Volume 20 - Article 14

» Rising marital disruption in Italy and its correlates
Volume 20 - Article 4

» Ukraine: On the border between old and new in uncertain times
Volume 19 - Article 29

» Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation
Volume 16 - Article 17

» Fertility change in Egypt: From second to third birth
Volume 15 - Article 18

» New fertility trends in Norway
Volume 2 - Article 3

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Changes in partnership patterns across the life course: An examination of 14 countries in Europe and the United States
Volume 33 - Article 6    | Keywords: cohabitation, Europe, marriage, partnership, unions

» Cohabitation among secular Jews in Israel: How ethnicity, education, and employment characteristics are related to young adults' living arrangements
Volume 35 - Article 32    | Keywords: cohabitation, family, marriage

» Introduction to research on immigrant and ethnic minority families in Europe
Volume 35 - Article 2    | Keywords: cohabitation, Europe, marriage

» Do co-residence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries
Volume 31 - Article 3    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, unions

» Cohabitation, nonmarital childbearing, and the marriage process
Volume 16 - Article 9    | Keywords: cohabitation, family, marriage